Contents


Credit:  I. LISKA/ICPDR  

Editorial

Dear Readers,

Joachim Bendow
Executive Secretary

Safe drinking water is a basic human need, but the need for water doesn’t stop there; water is also essential for irrigation, industrial production, energy generation, recreational purposes and tourism. Last but not least, waterways are an important route for the transportation of people and goods.
Taking into account these needs on the one side and the competing interests on the other, the question arises as to how much regulation is needed and how much liberalization is advisable.
Whatever balance we may decide onunder the curcurrent EU regulation, the price of water has to be paid and tariffs should be cost-covering but socially and commercially acceptable. In their effort to comply with EU legislation, all transition countries that have committed themselves to implementing the Danube River Protection Convention, and the EU accession countries in particular, are confronted with a heavy cost of legal reforms and investments in wastewater treatment facilities.
The implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive requires particular efforts even if accession countries and to a lesser degree other Danube countries receive important financial and technical support from the EU and - in the frame of twinning projects - from bilateral donors.
The present issue of Danube Watch focuses on the prioritization of investment projects for municipal wastewater treatment plants and cooperation with international financing institutions in the frame of DABLAS Task Force. Efficient use of pre-accession funds is not always an easy task for the candidate countries in spite of the fact that the financial means made available by the EU are an important contribution towards a reform of their water sector. Industries in transition countries need huge investments before they can meet EU emission standards. The question is how to make these investments and still remain competitive in the market.
Danube Watch also addresses agricultural pollution which calls for a new orientation in this sector and new farming systems and production methods, which in turn requires enormous investments. An opening of the markets is also essential.
However, the main concern of the public in the near future - as was underlined during the 3rd World Water Forum in Kyoto - will be the impact of the privatization and liberalization of the water market on the consumer. This might create social and economic problems that governments will have difficulty responding to. While the general public can respond to the rising fuel price by switching to alternatives such as public transportation, bicycles and finally by walking, they cannot do the same when it comes to drinking water. For water there is no alternative!


Joachim Bendow
Executive Secretary