International standards for farmed shark catfish are moving closer to being finalised following a third dialogue meeting in Viet Nam
Over the past decade, the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) has initiated eight aquaculture dialogues to develop global standards for farming shrimp, salmon, molluscs, tilapia, pangasius, abalone, trout and seriola/cobia. The dialogues represent species that have the greatest impact on the environment, the highest market value or the heaviest trading in the global market. With more than 2,000 farmers, conservationists, government officials and others taking part, the dialogues are seen as the world's most inclusive and transparent process for creating measurable, performance-based standards for aquaculture. Draft standards for tilapia were posted for public comment in September last year and final standards are expected to be completed this year, almost four years and five meetings after the dialogue was launched in 2005. The Pangasius Aquaculture Dialogue for shark catfish is expected to be shorter. Launched in Ho Chi Minh City in late 2007 (see Catch and Culture, Vol 14, No 1), the draft standards are expected to be posted for public comment during the first half of this year following a third meeting in Can Tho in December 2008. By early 2010, WWF hopes that all eight dialogues will have completed draft standards.
The draft standards discussed at the the recent Can Tho meeting are largely based on Viet Nam's experience as the world's largest producer, although they also reflect experiences in other producer countries which include China. The meeting, attended by more than 80 people, heard that standards will apply to all producing countries and every production system regardless of scale (in the Mekong Delta, the three production systems comprise ponds, pens and cages). Given that the standards are designed to be met by the top 20% in terms of industry performance based on current practices, others will have to modify their production systems in order to comply, which is expected to encourage innovation towards better performance. The standards are expected to be completed by the end of this year. David Graham of Birds Eye/Iglo, a British frozen foods distributor, told the meeting that they would promote profitable and sustainable growth and "protect the industry from catastrophic failure" while meeting demand for sustainable products and improving consumer confidence. Although they may later be expanded to more species, he said the standards would initially apply to the two main export species, Bocourt's catfish (Pangasius bocourti) and the Sutchi river catfish (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus) which was previously misidentified as Pangasius hypophthalmus. To add to the taxonomic confusion, both species are frequently marketed abroad as "pangasius" or sometimes even "basa", the Vietnamese name for the first species.
Water pollution, animal health and chemicals
The draft standards are designed to uphold eight principles
including minimising the negative impact of pangasius farming
on water resources by focussing on water quality, sludge, discharge,
nutrient efficiency and water budgets (see Table
1 on page 17). The indicators proposed to address water
pollution and waste management include total ammonia, dissolved
oxygen and total phosphorus, which are three of six parameters
used in a recent MRC assessment of water quality for aquatic
life in the Lower Mekong Basin (see MRC
Technical Paper No. 19).
In the area of health management, the standards are designed to implement measures to maintain healthy fish stocks and profitable activities by focussing on management efficiency and fish survival. It was felt by some stakeholders that "fish welfare" should be included in the standards. At the time of the December meeting, however, indicators were limited to survival rates and food conversion ratios during the growout period when the fish weigh more than 50g. The standards proposed for this period are a survival rate of more than 70% and an annual average of less than 2 for the economic feed conversion average, which is the volume of feed used divided by net fish production (biomass at harvest minus biomass stocked).
Indicator | Proposed standard |
---|---|
Total Ammonia (TAN) | <10 ppm |
Dissolved Oxygen (DO) | 4 mg/L or more |
Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD5)¹ | 10 mg/L or less |
Total Phosphorus (TP) | <5 mg/L |
Quality of discharge water (parameter values) | No more than 110 % of water received |
Direct discharge of sludge in public water bodies | Prohibited |
Nutrient efficiency | 64kg of nitrogen per tonne of fish² |
Turbidity of total discharge |
? |
Amount of water used per tonne of fish | ? |
¹dissolved oxygen consumed in five days
²with nitrogen accounting for 4% of diet and a food conservation
ratio of 1.6
Standards for antibiotics and chemicals are designed to uphold the principle of ensuring food safety and product quality while reducing the impact on the ecosystem and human health. With a focus on antibiotic and chemical use as well as residues in both fish and the environment, the dialogue had proposed four standards as of December (see Table 2 below). Participants agreed on the need for a fifth standard comprising a list of banned antibiotics and chemicals that takes into account international regulations and antibiotics for human use only. The meeting also agreed on the need to identify competent authorities such as fish health specialists to make veterinary prescriptions.
Ban on selective breeding seen as impractical
To address the issues of genetics and biodiversity, the proposed
standards also include the principle of minimising the impact
of pangasius farming on natural populations, local biodiversity
and natural habitats. The proposed indicators are based on non-indigenous
species and genetic diversity as well as biosecurity and escapees.
To address the latter, measures proposed included appropriate
bund height above high water or flood levels and traps on water
outlets. However, some of the proposed standards were seen as
problematic or impractical. One would prohibit pangasius farming
in areas that do not already have an established population
unless a "proper" risk assessment has been carried
out. Another would require seed to be sourced from stocks drawn
from pangasius populations already established in the "river
system" used by the farms and yet another would prohibit
the use of seed from genetically-modified organisms or hybrids.
The most controversial proposal would require selective breeding,
which has been strongly supported by Vietnamese authorities
(see Catch
and Culture
Vol 13, No 2), either to be prohibited or have an undefined
measure of similarity to wild stocks. This proposal was still
under debate.
Indicator | Proposed standard |
---|---|
Local regulations | Farmers must be able to prove that all antibiotics and chemicals are registered by local authorities to be used in aquaculture |
Veterinary prescriptions | Antibiotics must be prescribed by either a licensed or identified animal health specialist for a diagnosed disease |
Withdrawal after treatment | After any antibiotic or antiparasitic treatment, withdrawal periods must be respected according to product specificity. In the case of undocumented chemicals, the rule of 500 "degree days" must be applied (20 days at a water temperature of 25°C) |
Documented control plan | Farmers must carry out a "documented analysis control plan" on fish before harvest and the environment (possible parameters include heavy metals, chlorinated pesticides, malachite green and antibiotics) |
"Introducing a standard against selective breeding is impractical, hinders industry progress, and does not necessarily contribute to genetic and biodiversity integrity," said Flavio Corsin, the senior aquaculture advisor to WWF. In a summary of the December meeting, he proposed that the issue could be addressed by additional better management practices to minimise the risk of selectively-bred pangasius escaping into the wild. Dr Corsin also noted that the indicators and standards proposed only dealt with pangasius genetics and did not cover biodiversity.
Marine Stewardship Council draws a line in the sand
In January, the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) announced plans to fund the development of a new Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC) to ensure that farms comply with global certification standards. In a statement, WWF said it was "fully funding the business development phase for the ASC and the business strategy for this new venture, which is expected to be in operation within two years." The new body is expected to be similar to the London-headquartered MSC, established a decade ago by WWF and Dutch household products giant Unilever. The announcement followed a decision by the MSC board of trustees in late 2006 not to expand the scope of its certification programme to include aquaculture. The MSC has, however, since clarified its position on "enhanced fisheries" involving different forms and degrees of human intervention. The clarification, announced in March, opens the way for many forms of enhanced fisheries to be assessed under its wild capture fisheries certification programme. In a statement, the council noted that its board confirmed last year that the MSC would not be expanding the programme to include farms. But it also recognised that a "wide variety" of enhanced fisheries existed between wild capture fisheries and aquaculture—and that the MSC had been increasingly asked in recent years to clarify the scope of its programme. Since late 2007, the MSC executive and governance bodies had discussed the issue at three separate meetings. At the latest meeting in January, "the MSC agreed that in many instances the MSC Standard for sustainable and well-managed fisheries is a suitable and robust tool for assessing the sustainability of an enhanced fishery," the statement said. The council also recognised the need to develop further technical guidance.
Many new fisheries expected to be assessed
"This is an important clarification of the scope of the
MSC Standard," said MSC chief executive Rupert Howes.
"While enhanced fisheries have always been represented
within the MSC programme, the MSC has never defined the limits
to the scope for enhanced fisheries to be assessed. The decision
on enhanced fisheries draws a line in the sand that will inform
potential fisheries as to whether or not they are now in scope
for an MSC assessment. We believe many new fisheries will
now move forward into assessment process now we have this
clarification." The MSC said it would closely follow
assessments of enhanced fisheries over the next 6-24 months
to ensure consistency of approach. "In some instances
new guidance will be required as part of the full assessment
process to ensure that the fishery impacts can be assessed,"
the statement said. The council has a long history of engaging
with fisheries that include some form of enhancement. These
include the hatchery-based stocking components in the Alaska
salmon fishery—certified in 2000 and again in 2007—and
habitat modifications in a British cockle fishery that was
first certified in 2001. In addition, the MSC is currently
assessing clam aquaculture in Viet Nam for certification in
a process that dates back to 2005 (see page 27). The estimated
retail value of products bearing the MSC logo is estimated
around US$1.4 billion a year. In April, MSC labelled products
were available in 42 countries, up from 36 a year earlier.
The top three markets were Germany, the United States and
Britain.
"New criteria, indicators and standards will need to be added to address this," he said. Moreover, "the idea of a risk assessment before allowing the introduction of a certain pangasius species to areas in which that species is neither native nor established is problematic. If the standards mean to prohibit farming in areas without native populations, we should simply do so. A higher degree of speci.city for how the standards approach the concept of 'local' stock, 'local' farm, and 'river system' is required." He also questioned whether sterile hybrids or all-male production should be included and noted that some stakeholders felt that genetically-modified organisms should not be permitted even if they are sterile.
The other four principles governing the eight issues being addressed by the dialogue include locating and operating farms within established national and local legal frameworks. In addition, farms should be located, designed and built to minimise negative impacts on other users and the environment and farrners should use feed and feeding practices that make efficient use of valuable feed resources and minimise waste. To address social responsibility and user conflicts, farms should be developed and operated in a sociallyresponsible manner that contributes effectively to rural development and poverty alleviation.
Doing their own thing
In the meantime, Dutch importer Anova Food BV has sought its
own certification for pangasius farming and feed production
from ISACert, a Dutch auditing and certification body which
specialises in standards for agriculture and food processing
as well as packaging and logistics. The "Anova Trace"
certification is designed to achieve total control of the food
chain so that each frozen catfish fillet imported to Europe
can be traced. The "Trace Panga Management Program"
includes feed programs, veterinary controls, environmental awareness,
bacterial controls, checks on water quality and social standards.
The "Trace Panga Supply Chain Control" includes controls
on pre-mix and feed suppliers with Anova staff in Ho Chi Minh
City regularly auditing suppliers to meet traceability standards.
The company also applies strict controls on veterinary products
and requires farmers to maintain complete up-to-date records
on the origin of juvenile fish as well as feed and biomass.
In addition, processors are subject to checks and audits. The
certification, expected to be superseded when the global standards
are in place, was announced in September last year, shortly
after Anova signed a cooperation agreement with WWF to support
sustainable fisheries in Indonesia, where the company buys tuna.
Anova imports frozen Sutchi river catfish from Viet Nam, mainly
skinless and boneless fillets but also fish that have had only
their tails and fins removed. The Dutch company also imports
frozen fillets of tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) farmed in
China and various cuts of freshly-caught Nile perch (Lates niloticus)
from Lake Victoria in East Africa where it has an office in
Kenya.
Further reading
http://www.worldwildlife.org/what/globalmarkets/aquaculture/
pangasius-additionalresources.html
MRC (2008) An assessment of water quality in the Lower Mekong Basin, MRC Technical Paper No. 19, Mekong River Commission, Vientiane, 70 pp