14.6 FORESTRY
Flooded and riparian
forests / Loss
of forest cover: impacts on catchments and stream ecology
/
Transboundary issues
The importance of forests to stream ecology--
The changing sequence of forest communities along the length of the Mekong
River is an important source of biodiversity and biological resiliency.
Forests provide a number of important functions for stream ecosystems:
Shade and temperature moderation
Bank stability and erosion control by providing solid root mass
and ground cover
Nutrient and food source
Stream physical features vary from small torrential
headwater streams to the gently flowing, meandering rivers that pass through
lowland swamp forests (see Section 3). Headwater streams usually have
more water energy and are more erosive than the low energy depositional
streams in lowland areas, with variations in between. Accordingly, forest
streams can differ greatly in terms of their physical, chemical and biological
characteristics, depending on their location in the watershed (see Section
6).
Plants and animals found in a around the water are adapted to the combination
of conditions that exist in different types of streams. Removal of the
surrounding forest will change conditions making them unsuitable for some
species and more suitable for others. Significant changes in plant and
animal community structure can result. Particularly on smaller streams,
the forest canopy limits the amount of light penetrating to the water
surface. Removal of riparian vegetation will decrease this shading effect,
which in turn can result in elevated water temperatures.
The removal of forest cover can affect the quality, quantity and timing
of stream flows. If trees are removed from a large portion of a watershed,
flow quantity can increase substantially. The ultimate impact depends
on the amount of vegetation removed and proximity of the removal site
to the stream. Increases in flood peak can occur if vegetation in the
areas closest to the stream is removed. Long-term loss of riparian vegetation
can result in bank erosion and channel widening.
Wood that falls from the forest into streams can add to in-stream habitat
diversity/complexity by providing shelter for fish and invertebrates.
This woody debris can also helping to shape the form of the stream and
control local flow characteristics by affecting sediment storage and transport
processes. The amount of wood available to serve this function may be
reduced or eliminated by removing forest cover.
Material dropping from the tree branches can be important: leaves and
organic matter from trees add nutrients to the stream; and insects and
other small animals supply food to fish and invertebrates in the stream
(see Sections 5 and 6).
Flooded and Riparian Forests--
Riparian forests occur along riverbanks with shrubs and trees that are
relatively tolerant to submergence located close to the waters edge and
less tolerant varieties located further inland. It is widely acknowledged
that the flooded forest and floodplain vegetation on the shoreline of
the Great Lake and Tonle Sap River system in Cambodia are among the most
important and diverse habitats in the region, and that these environments
are critical to birds and wildlife in the area.
Most of the floodplain terrain (approx. 80%) is covered by semi-continuous,
locally homogenous stands of short trees and large shrubs; however, tall
(7-15 m) and dense gallery forests commonly skirt the lake shoreline and
river ways of the floodplain. Key flooded forest species that are important
for fisheries and waterfowl include Hydrocarpus anthelmintica and Homalium
brevidans. Aquatic herbaceous vegetation, including floating mats of water
hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes), is also common throughout the floodplain
area.
Flooded forests are sometimes located away from the water's edge but are
in low elevation areas that may be inundated each year when floodwaters
rise. Flooded forest in the Great Lake area provide habitat for many species
specially adapted to the seasonal flood pattern. They are of particular
importance as spawning and rearing areas for fish species that enter from
the main river. Some fish species tend to need good water quality conditions
and usually retreat quickly to the main river as flood water recedes (whitefish),
while other species can endure harsher conditions and tend to spend longer
times in backwater areas of the forests (blackfish). Current human pressures
on flooded forests include fuel wood collection and charcoal production,
as well as conversion to agricultural lands. It has been estimated that
from an original one million ha of forest land around the Great Lake there
is now approximately 360,000 ha of flooded forest and 157,000 ha of degraded
forest and associated vegetation types.
Loss of forest cover: impacts
on catchments & stream ecology--
Forestry practices have far-reaching impacts on the economic and ecological
health of the basin. Thirty percent (30%) of the LMB catchments, due to
their biophysical conditions, should be classified as hydrological protection
forests (Class I areas), or protection and limited production forests
(Class II areas).
Class I forests include headwater areas, which are usually at high
elevations, have very steep slopes and should remain under permanent forest
cover.
Class II forests are usually found at high elevations, with steep
to very steep slopes, and landforms that require soil and water conservation
restrictions.
Most of the Class I and II forests are in Lao PDR (69%), followed by Thailand
(14%), Viet Nam (13%) and Cambodia (4%).
Forest cover is declining in all Mekong River Basin riparian countries.
At present, losses of forest cover can be attributed to a number of activities
including:
Excessive and/or inefficient commercial logging;
Shifting cultivation;
Encroachment for human settlements;
Farming and infrastructure development; and
Intensive fuel wood collection.
Historically, large areas of forest along the Lower
Mekong, including significant areas of wetland vegetation, were severely
and in some cases irreparably damaged from heavy use of defoliants during
the American/Vietnam War.
Recent forest cover losses (early 1980s to late 1990s) in three LMB countries
are highlighted in the table below.
-
|
Early 1980s
|
Late 1990s
|
Net Loss During Period
|
Country
|
Forest Cover (Million ha)
|
% of Total Land Area
|
Forest Cover (Million ha)
|
% of Total Land Area
|
Forest Cover Loss
(Million ha)
|
% Forest Cover Loss
|
Viet Nam
|
10.6
|
32.1%
|
9.3
|
28.2%
|
1.3
|
12%
|
Cambodia
|
11.2
|
70%
|
9.1
|
58%
|
2.1
|
19%
|
Loa PDR
|
9.8 *
|
47%
|
8.5
|
40%
|
1.3
|
13%
|
Total
|
31.6
|
-
|
26.9
|
-
|
4.7
|
15%
|
* 1989 estimate (Source: WWF.
2001. The forests of the Lower Mekong Ecoregion Complex)
|
Loss of forest cover from logging and other clearing
activities that are poorly planned and implemented can seriously affect
stream ecology. Effects include:
Erosion unplanned deforestation can increase
surface runoff rate increasing erosion
High sediment loads increased erosion will lead to increased
sediment in streams
Altered hydrology faster runoff will cause more rapid and higher-volume
flood events
Altered nutrient regimes loss of organic debris and food organisms
Altered species composition and abundance impairment of physical/chemical
properties can result in reduced biodiversity
Transboundary issues--
Transboundary issues relate both to the physical/ecological consequences
of forest clearing activities and to difficulties for institutions on
different sides of borders to deal with the problems. Major issues relate
to:
Erosion and changes in river channel morphology
Alteration in flow/flood patterns
Pollution flows
Institutional constraints.
Additional information on transboundary ecological effects
is provided in Section 11.
|