Atmospheric depositions of PCDD/Fs on the Baltic Sea

	Editor(s): Alexey Gusev, EMEP MSC-E

Key message

  Total annual atmospheric depositions of PCDD/Fs to the Baltic Sea have decreased in period from 1990 to 2005 by 50%.

Results and Assessment

Relevance of the indicator for describing the developments in the environment

This indicator shows the levels and trends in PCDD/F atmospheric depositions to the Baltic Sea. The depositions of PCDD/Fs represent the pressure of emission sources on the Baltic Sea aquatic environment.

Policy relevance and policy reference

HELCOM adopted a Recommendation in May 2001 for the cessation of hazardous substance discharges/emissions by 2020, with the ultimate aim of achieving concentrations in the environment near to background values for naturally occurring substances and close to zero for man-made synthetic substances.

Assessment

Total annual atmospheric depositions of PCDD/Fs to the surface of the Baltic Sea have decreased in period 1990-2005 by 50% (Figure 1). On the level of individual sub-basins the most significant drop in PCDD/F depositions can be noted for the Belt Sea (66%) and the Kattegat (65%). For other sub-basins the decrease of depositions varies from 28% to 49% (Table 1).

The highest levels of PCDD/Fs depositions over the Baltic Sea can be noted for its southern-western part (the Belt Sea). In other sub-basins the level of deposition fluxes is about 1 ng TEQ/m²/y. Lowest level of PCDD/F deposition fluxes is obtained for the Gulf of Bothnia.

Among the HELCOM countries the most significant contributions to depositions over the Baltic Sea belong to Poland, Sweden, and Finland (20%, 12%, and 11%).

Figure 1: Computed total annual atmospheric depositions of PCDD/Fs to the Baltic Sea for the period 1990-2005, (% of 1990).

Figure 2:  Time-series of computed total annual atmospheric deposition of PCDD/Fs to six sub-basins of the Baltic Sea for the period 1990-2005 in g TEQ/year as bars (left axis) and total deposition fluxes in ng TEQ/m²/year as lines (right axis). Note that different scales are used for total depositions in g TEQ/year and the same scales for total deposition fluxes. Click image to enlarge!

Data

Table 1. Computed total annual depositions of PCDD/Fs to six Baltic Sea sub-basins for period 1990-2005. Units: g TEQ/year

Metadata

Technical information:

1. Source: EMEP/MSC-E

2. Description of data: The atmospheric depositions of PCDD/Fs were obtained using the latest version of MSCE-POP model developed at EMEP/MSC-E (Gusev et al., 2005). The latest available official emission data for the HELCOM countries have been used in the model computations. Emissions of PCDD/Fs for each year of this period were officially reported to the UN ECE Secretariat by most of HELCOM countries. These data are available from EMEP emission database WEBDAB: http://webdab.emep.int. Some of the HELCOM countries submitted part of the data for this period. Lithuania submitted data for 1997-2005. For previous years emission values were obtained using extrapolation. Russia did not report the information on emission for 2001, and 2003- 2005. Value of emission for 2001 was obtained using interpolation between emissions for 2000 and 2002. Emissions for 2003-2005 were estimated using interpolation between emission for 2002 and forecast of emission for 2010.

3. Geographical coverage: Atmospheric depositions of PCDD/Fs were obtained for the European region.

4. Temporal coverage: Timeseries of annual atmospheric depositions are available for the period 1990 – 2005.

5. Methodology and frequency of data collection: Atmospheric input and source allocation budgets of PCDD/Fs to the Baltic Sea and its catchment area were computed using the latest version of MSCE-POP model. MSCE-POP is the regional-scale model operating within the EMEP region. This is a three-dimensional Eulerian model which includes processes of emission, advection, turbulent diffusion, wet and dry depositions, degradation, gaseous exchange with underlying surface, and inflow of pollutant into the model domain. Horizontal grid of the model is defined using stereographic projection with spatial resolution 50 km at 60º latitude. The description of EMEP horizontal grid system can be found in the internet (http://www.emep.int/grid/index.html). Vertical structure of the model consists of 15 non-uniform layers defined in the terrain-following s-coordinates and covers almost the whole troposphere. Detailed description of the model can be found in EMEP reports (Gusev et al., 2005) and in the Internet on EMEP web page http://www.emep.int under the link to information on Persistent Organic Pollutants. Meteorological data used in the calculations for 1990-2005 were obtained using MM5 meteorological data preprocessor on the basis of the Re-analysis project data prepared by National Centers for Environmental Predictions together with National Center of the Atmospheric Research (NCEP/NCAR) in the USA (http://wesley.ncep.noaa.gov/reanalysis.html).

Calculations of atmospheric transport and depositions of PCDD/Fs are provided on the regular basis annually two years in arrears on the basis of emission data officially submitted by Parties to CLRTAP Convention.

Quality information:

6. Strength and weakness:

Strength: annually updated information on atmospheric input of PCDD/Fs to the Baltic Sea and its sub-basins.

Weakness: uncertainties in officially submitted data on emissions of PCDD/Fs.

7. Uncertainty: The MSCE-POP model results were compared with measurements of EMEP monitoring network [Gusev et al., 2006, Shatalov et al., 2005]. The model was evaluated through the comparison with available measurements during EMEP TFMM meetings held in 2005 in Zagreb and in Moscow. It was concluded that the MSCE-POP model is suitable for the evaluation of the long range transboundary transport and deposition of POPs in Europe.

8. Further work required: Further work is required on reducing uncertainties in emission data and modeling approaches used in MSCE-POP model.

References

Gusev A., I. Ilyin, L.Mantseva, O.Rozovskaya, V. Shatalov, O. Travnikov [2006] Progress in further development of MSCE-HM and MSCE-POP models (implementation of the model review recommendations.  EMEP/MSC-E Technical Report 4/2006. (http://www.msceast.org/reps/4_2006.zip)

Gusev A., E. Mantseva, V. Shatalov, B.Strukov [2005] Regional multicompartment model MSCE-POP EMEP/MSC-E Technical Report 5/2005. (http://www.msceast.org/events/review/pop_description.html)

Shatalov V., Gusev A., Dutchak S., Holoubek I., Mantseva E., Rozovskaya O., Sweetman A., Strukov B. and N.Vulykh [2005] Modelling of POP Contamination in European Region: Evaluation of the Model Performance. Technical Report 7/2005. (http://www.msceast.org/reps/7_2005.zip)

For reference purposes, please cite this indicator fact sheet as follows:

[Author’s name(s)], [Year]. [Indicator Fact Sheet title]. HELCOM Indicator Fact Sheets 2007. Online. [Date Viewed], http://www.helcom.fi/environment2/ifs/en_GB/cover/.
 

Last updated 3.9.2007