Global Ballast Water Management header GloBallast Partnerships Project
Home
Home > GloBallast Programme > R & D Directory > 1st International R&D Symposium Abstracts
Contact Search Print
The Problem
The International Response
The IMO Convention
The IMO Technical Guidelines
GloBallast Partnerships
Global Industry Alliance
Treatment Technology
R & D Directory
Legislation & Regulations
Library Collection
Newsletter
Publications
Awareness Materials
BBC-IMO: Invaders From the Sea
The GloBallast Programme
Directories & Databases
Links

1st International Ballast Water Treatment R&D Symposium

IMO London 26-27 March 2001

Abstracts

 

This document contains the Abstracts of papers presented at the 1st International Ballast Water Treatment R&D Symposium held at IMO in London on 26 and 27 March 2001. Abstracts are listed in order presented according to the symposium programme.


Ballast Water Treatment – An Overview of Options

Alan Taylor1 & Geoff Rigby2

This review covers essentially all of the ballast water management and treatment options that have practical significance at the present time. These include ballast water exchange, heating, filtration, hydrocyclones, ultraviolet irradiation, chemicals, use of fresh or treated water and shore based or dedicated ship treatment.

The review covers work that has been reported over the past 10 years and up to the present time. This project has only recently been completed.

The main objective of this work has been to review the current status and technical effectiveness of appropriate treatment technologies and to develop indicative cost data for use of these options as a basis for comparison and selection by ship owners and operators. For the cost comparisons, the project considers three ship sizes; a Cape Size Bulk Carrier, an LNG Carrier and a Container Vessel.

Details of the various techniques, together with the cost comparisons that have been used in the studies are summarised in the complete report.

1Alan H Taylor and Associates , 59 Hillcrest Drive, Templestowe, Victoria 3106 , Australia

Tel: +61 3 9846 2650, Fax:  +61 3 9846 2650, Email: aht@ahtaylor.com , Web: www.ahtaylor.com

2 Reninna Pty Limited, 36 Creswell Avenue , Charlestown, NSW 2290, Australia.

Tel: +61 2 4943 0450 , Fax: +61 2 4947 8938, Email:  rigby@mail.com


Ballast Water Treatment by Filtration

Jose T. Matheickal1, Thomas. D. Waite2 & Sam T. Mylvaganam1

Singapore Environmental Technology Institute (ETI), in collaboration with the Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (MPA) and National University of Singapore (NUS) has been working on a multi-faceted R&D project on ballast water treatment. One of the objectives of this programme is to develop an effective ballast water treatment system for onboard use.

The primary treatment system being considered is based on screen filtration technology. Various secondary treatment options such as UV, ultrasonic and biocides are also being studied to compliment the filtration process. This paper focuses on screening technology.

Screen filtration has been in use for over 20 years with screens having filtration capabilities of 40 micron and larger. Advances in manufacturing technology of woven or slotted stainless steel screen over the last decade have enabled filters to remove particles down to 10-micron range.  Automatic self-cleaning screen filtration is gaining popularity now as they have a small footprint even for filtration, including large flow rates, and are simple to operate and less complex in terms of piping and valving. The backwash water loss can be as low as 1% of the total throughput volume.

Screen filtration systems have been previously tested using ship-mounted and barge-mounted ballast filtration systems. Also, a clear consensus is emerging that several alternative technological options for pathogen inactivation (e.g., UV, ultrasound) would require a pre-filtration stage for effective removal of larger particles in ballast water.

This paper presents the results of the research carried out at Singapore ETI to date.  The studies show that self-cleaning screen filtration is a potentially effective treatment technology for ballast water management. The studies also showed that technologies that are currently available ‘off-the-shelf’, are not designed to meet the requirements of normal ballasting operations. Considerable modifications and system re-engineering will have to be made to develop a dedicated ballast water filtration system.

1 Environmental Technology Institute, Innovation Centre (NTU), Unit 237, Block 2,  18 Nanyang Drive, Singapore 637723

Tel: +65 7941556, Fax: +65 7921291, Email: jtmat h@rti.org.sg, Web: www.eti.org.sg

2 College of Engineering, University of Miami, 1251 Memorial Drive, Coral Gables, Florida 33146, United States of America

Tel: +1 305 284 2908 , Fax: +1 305 284 2885

Email: twaite@miami.edu


Ballast Water Treatment by Ozonation

Aage Bjřrn Andersen, Egil Dragsund & Bjřrn Olaf Johannessen

Ozone is used for disinfection in a number of applications ranging from grey water treatment, treatment of potable water and those related to industrialised processes such as aquaculture, and electricity production.

These areas of application involve fresh water. Ballast water may be  fresh-, brackish or salt water. The introduction of ions present in seawater changes the mechanisms associated with ozonation. The use of ozone as a treatment of ballast water has been considered by review of relevant literature and laboratory testing of:

  • Efficiency of ozone disinfection
  • Oxidant decay rates in sea water
  • Corrosivity of ozone treated sea water

This work was initiated by Barber Ship Management and undertaken with funding from the Norwegian Research Council.

Aage Bjřrn Andersen

Det Norske Veritas, Veritasveien 1, N-1322 Hřvik, Norway

Tel: +47 67 579900, Fax: +47 67 579911, Email: Aage.Bjorn.Andersen@dnv.com


  Ballast Water Treatment by Heat – An Overview

  Geoff Rigby1, Alan Taylor2 and Gustaaf Hallegraeff3

This review covers the use of waste heat from a ship’s main engine to kill harmful organisms.

The review covers work carried out by the authors over the past years as well as recent work reported by other workers. The main objective of the review has been to assess, evaluate and demonstrate the option of heating ballast water to a temperature sufficiently high to minimise or eliminate the translocation of harmful organisms. 

The pioneering work in this area was based on time-temperature laboratory studies and shipboard trials with Gymnodinium catenatum cysts and other phytoplankton algae by Bolch and Hallegraeff (1993);  Rigby (1994) and Hallegraeff (1998) together with thermodynamic analyses of available heat from the main engine of the 140,000 DWT BHP bulk Carrier, Iron Whyalla by Rigby and Taylor (1993) to assess the various modes of heating. This work resulted in the development of an optimum arrangement for international voyages where the hot water from the main engine cooling circuit is flushed through each tank (Figure 1). Full scale ship trials were undertaken to confirm predictions (Rigby et al., 1998, 1999). In addition to these studies, a number of other options involving the recirculation of water through additional heat exchangers utilising waste heat and steam (in some cases) have been proposed.  The findings of these studies are summarised in this paper.

1 Reninna Pty Limited, 36 Creswell Avenue, Charlestown, NSW 2290, Australia.

Tel: +61 2 4943 0450, Fax: +61 2 4947 8938, Email:  rigby@mail.com

2Alan H Taylor and Associates, 59 Hillcrest Drive, Templestowe, Victoria 3106, Australia

Tel: +61 3 9846 2650, Fax:  +61 3 9846 2650, Email: aht@ahtaylor.com, Web: www.ahtaylor.com

3Department of Plant Science, University of Tasmania, GPO Box 252 -55, Hobart, Tasmania 7001 , Australia

Tel: +61 3 6226 2623, Fax: +61 3 6226 2698, Email: Hallegraeff@plant.utas.edu.au


Ballast Water Treatment by Heat – EU Shipboard Trials

Peilin Zhou & Vassilios Lagogiannis

This paper reports on one component of the EU-funded research project ‘On Board Treatment of Ballast Water (Technologies Development and Applications) and Application of Low-sulphur Marine Fuel (MARTOB)’

All ballast water treatment options will be examined and analysed at the initial stage of the project, six of which will be further investigated in laboratories and subsequent sea trials. The six treatment methods are; high temperature treatment, biological de-oxygenation, combination of UV/US, ozone treatment, hydrogen peroxide treatment (oxicide method) and hurdle technology.  The project will run over three years, commencing from the beginning of 2001.  The main outputs of the project will be:

  • Comprehensive documents with detailed description of individual treatment methods. The documents will present all facts necessary for ship operators to make a rational choice of ballast water management strategy.

  • Treatment equipment, system designs and design tools, ready for commercial application on the completion of the project.

  • Reports and recommendations to the European Commission, ICES, IOC, shipowner associations, and other public domains, including regional bodies such HELCOM, OSPARCOM and BBCMBS, and further to influence IMO regulations through governmental authorities. The reports and recommendations will address limitations of ballast water treatment onboard ships, environmental, economic impacts, risk and safety issues.

The project consists of six work packages from state of the art research to technical development, laboratory test/demonstration, full-scale sea trials and results dissemination and recommendations. 

The research consortium comprises 25 partners from Europe including expertise from academic, marine consultants, research institutes, equipment manufacturers, classification societies, shipowner associations and shipping companies.

This specific paper presents the results of a Feasibility study on a thermal plant installation on an oil taker.  The main objective of the feasibility study is to conduct a preliminary design of an apparatus that will perform rapid heat treatment for the incoming ballast water of an oil tanker. Based on the results of this study and design, a cost analysis is performed along with conclusions and recommendations for further development of such a system.

Dr. Peilin Zhou, Dept. of Ship and Marine Technology, University of Strathclyde, 100 Montrose Street, Glasgow G4 0LZ, Scotland

Tel: +44 141 548 3344, Fax: +44 141 552 2879, Email: peilin.zhou@strath.ac.uk


Ballast Water Treatment by Heat – NZ Shipboard Trials

  Doug Mountfort

(Paper/Abstract not available before the symposium)

Dr Douglas Opie Mountfort , Senior Scientist , Cawthron Institute , 98 Halifax Street East , Private Bag 2 , Nelson , New Zealand

Tel: +64 3 548 2319 , Fax: +64 3 546 9464 , Email: doug@cawthron.org.nz , Web: www.cawthron.org.nz


Ballast Water Treatment by De-Oxygenation (the AquaHabiStat™ System)

Wilson J. Browning, Jr. & Wilson J. Browning III

This paper presents on a mechanical, 72 ton per hour high speed ballast water treatment system that uses a vacuum chamber to remove dissolved oxygen from ballast water resulting in a 10-day low oxygen condition within the ballast tank/ballast hold (the AquaHabiStat™ System)

The prototype research is completed and consisted of three 10-day time series tests during the northern summer of 2000 and two 10-day time series in December 2000.  The research aimed to measure the effect of high speed vacuum oxygen removal over time, and to create a low cost, high performance full- size ballast water treatment system.

Research methods involved the removal of dissolved oxygen with utilizing a vacuum chamber over time and assessment of bio-effectiveness using microscopic counts and ATP biomass measurements.

Generally, the biological results from microscopic analysis of the treatment of ballast water show an immediate kill of live zooplankton between 50-75%, and a nearly complete reduction within two days of treatment. Under the ATP total biomass analysis, ATP levels showed an average of 86% reduction down to 10 microns in ten days. Ten days was the target time for all treatment, as the shortest ballast voyage from Europe to the East Coast of the United States.   

Browning Transport Management, Inc., 127 Bank Street, Norfolk, Virginia 23510, United States of America

Tel: +1 757-6222-3321, Fax: +1 757-625-7456, Email will@wjbrowning.com / leslie@wjbrowning.com


Ballast Water Treatment by Multiwave Lamps

Ben F. Kalisvaart

Ultraviolet (UV) light has become widely accepted for the disinfection of potable water, process water and wastewater as an alternative to chlorination. A potential new application is UV treatment of ballast water.

To avoid the failure of a UV disinfection system due to the recovery of micro-organisms, certain additional wavelengths in the UV area are emitted by newly developed UV lamps. To reduce the chance of microbial recovery after ultraviolet irradiation, damage must be inflicted in as many areas of the micro-organism as possible.

The effective killing of micro-organisms by polychromatic high intensity medium pressure UV lamps is due to their exceptionally high UV energy output at specific wavelengths across a broad section of the UV spectrum. The combination of these properties results in several different lethal effects in small and large micro-organisms. Important biological molecules other than DNA are likely to be damaged, which helps to prevent the recovery of irradiated micro-organisms.

Absorption line spectra of absorbing nucleotide bases, DNA and other biological molecules including proteins and enzymes show how effective UV light can be. Recent findings on the biological effects of short wavelengths on Bacillus subtilis, Cryptosporidium parvum and Escherichia coli confirms the effect of short wavelengths. Practical comparisons with conventional low pressure UV lamps at equal UV dosages show better killing rates from high intensity medium pressure lamps, without formation of disinfection-by-products (DBPs).

Ben F. Kalisvaart, Berson UV-techniek, P.O.Box 90, 5670 AB Nuenen, The Netherlands

Tel +31 40 290 7777, Fax: +31 40 283 5755, Email: sales@bersonuv.com


Ballast Water Treatment by Electro-ionisation

Joseph Aliotta1, Andrew Rogerson2, Courtney B. Campbell2 & Mark Yonge1

Electro-ionization technology has been used in freshwater treatment applications but has never before been tested with marine or brackish samples. A modified pilot test system was assembled and used to treat marine samples containing large numbers of indigenous marine organisms typical of those found in ballast water. The system consisted of a holding tank (containing 300 liters of biota-rich seawater), a CLORINTM gas generator and a NI-OX/LTM gas generator. These treatment components together comprised the ClorinoxylTM module. 

Since the bulk of the biota in marine waters is small (less than 20 mm in size), test runs focused on the survival of microbes, namely bacteria and protists (unicellular algae and protozoa). It was assumed that the sensitivities of these microbial groups to treatment reflected those of macrobiota in the water. Treatment involved exposing biota to reactive species of mixed oxidant gases (O, N and Cl) in the holding tank. Since rapid treatment is required by the industry, the maximum contact time of any test run was 15 min. Survival curves were used to fine tune the prototype system and these results were used to optimize operating parameters of the component reactors,

This paper presents results demonstrating that the ClorinoxylTM unit can kill over 90% of the bacteria in 300 l of water within just 2-minute contact time treatment, and kill all detectable organisms within just 15-minute contact time treatment. Moreover, residual chlorine levels in the treated water were less than 0.3 ppm when contact time treatment was short.  This first process flow design is sensitive to the problems of ballast treatment systems and shows promise for future systems that could be designed for shipboard application, shore-based application or tender ballast treatment systems.  

1Marine Environmental Partners Inc., 3001 West State Road 84, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33312 , United States of America

Tel: +1 954 791 3700, Fax: +1 954 791 2447, Email: mark@mepi.net, Web: www.mepi.net

2Oceanographic Center, Nova Southeastern University, 8000 N. Ocean Drive, Dania Beach, Florida 33004 , United States of America


Ballast Water Treatment by Gas Super-saturation

  Anders Jelmert

Gas super-saturation is known to affect various aquatic biota. When aquatic multicellular organisms are exposed to gas supersaturated water, and especially when subsequently subjected to lowered hydrostatic pressures, they may suffer from embolism and haemorrhages. If the level of super-saturation is high enough, the condition may be lethal.  Also sub-lethal exposures represent a considerable stress to the organisms. While lethal effects occasionally have been observed in natural or semi-natural conditions, we have suggested it can be optimized and used to prevent the transfer of unwanted organisms translocated via ballast water.

The susceptibility to gas super-saturation varies between different systematic groups of organisms such as molluscs Mya arenaria at 114%,  and Argopecten irridans concentricus at 116%, sub-adults of the saltwater tilapia Oreochromis spilurus, at 112% , larvae of the white sturgeon Acipenser transmontanus at 131%.  Results from tests on the effect of gas (air and nitrogen + air mixture) supersaturated seawater on the brine shrimp Artemia sp. and juveniles of the common mollusc Mytilus edulis are presented. General applications, advantages and limitations of the method are discussed.

Anders Jelmert , Institute of Marine Research , Austevoll Aquaculture Research Station , N.5392 Storebř , Norway

Tel:  +47 56 18 03 42 , Fax: +47 56 18 03 98 , E-mail: anders.jelmert@imr.no


Seakleen®, a Potential Natural Biocide for Ballast Water Treatment

David A. Wright1 & Rodger Dawson2

This paper reports on five years of investigations into the efficacy of a new generation of natural product biocides as potentially environmentally friendly, highly economical ballast water treatments. Earlier work on juglone demonstrated a high degree of toxicity to a broad spectrum of aquatic organisms. Toxicity is maintained in freshwater over a broad pH range, and in estuarine water over a broad salinity range. More recent studies on a proprietary nutricide, SEAKLEENâ (Vitamar Inc., patent approved and pending) have demonstrated toxicity to a broad spectrum of marine and freshwater organisms including fish larvae and eggs, planktonic crustaceans including spiny water fleas, bivalve larvae (including zebra mussels), Vibrio bacteria (congeneric with the cholera bacteria) and dinoflagellates including dinoflagellate cysts where complete chloroplast destruction was recorded within 2h.

The partition coefficient of SEAKLEENâ and related compounds is approximately 2, meaning that they will remain in dissolved form in the face of heavy sediment loads. SEAKLEENâ is toxic to the benthic amphipod Leptocheirus plumulosus, thereby demonstrating its efficacy in treating residual sediment in ballast tanks. In marine waters SEAKLEENâ and related compounds degrade relatively rapidly to non-toxic by-products, with half-lives of 16-30h. It is anticipated that ballast water discharge will not, therefore, represent a toxic threat to receiving waters. 

Toxicity of SEAKLEENâ to all of the organisms tested was ca. 1ppm (mg L-1), indicating an effective treatment dose around 1-2g. per metric tonne of ballast water. For most applications, it is anticipated that SEAKLEENâ would retail at <$0.2 per metric tonne of ballast water treated. No pre-treatment would be required. Dosing equipment would retail @ ca. $1600.

1University of Maryland, Center for Environmental Science , Chesapeake Biological Laboratory , P.O. Box 38, Solomons, MD 20688 , United States of America

Tel: +1 410 326 7240, Fax: +1 410 326 7210, Email: wright@cbl.umces.edu.

2University of Maryland, Center for Environmental Science, Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, P.O. Box 38, Solomons, MD 20688 , United States of America

Tel: +1 (410) 326 7394, Fax: +1 (410) 326 7210, Email: dawson@chesapeake.net.


Peraclean®Ocean – a Potential Ballast Water Treatment Option

Rainer Fuchs1, Norbert Steiner1, Ingrid de Wilde1, & Matthias Voigt2

Chemical treatment with Peracleanâ Ocean is potentially one method to effectively remove organisms and pathogens in ballast water. This paper summarizes the laboratory results of an ongoing German research project, and provides details on the efficacy and toxicological properties of Peracleanâ Ocean.

The tests of Peracleanâ Ocean as a chemical ballast water treatment option are part of an ongoing research project in Germany (1998 – 2001), that is funded by industry (Degussa AG) and the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research with the title ‘Process for the removal of organisms from different waters’[1]).

Peraclean® Ocean is a liquid biocide formulation based on peroxy acetic acid (PAA) PAA containing formulations are widely used in the food and beverage industry as well as in sewage treatment plants and other water treatment processes. They found wide application in the treatment of cooling water and as a pre-treatment of biologically contaminated waters prior to discharge into the environment. PAA is permitted in the USA as a secondary and indirect food additive at concentrations up to 100 mg/l.

The shelf-life of Peracleanâ Ocean is at least 1 year: more than 90% of the original activity is still present after one year’s storage at room temperature. Peraclean® Ocean is commercially available in 220l drums, 1 m3 IBCs or in 20 m3 bulk containers.

For a first evaluation of the performance of Peracleanâ Ocean, the Artemia Testing Standard (ATS) was applied. This benchmark test uses the brine shrimp, Artemia salina, as indicator organism. The ATS involves 4 different development stages of the brine shrimp: adults, larvae, nauplius-stages, pre-incubated eggs and cysts.  The ATS-data showed that the addition of Peracleanâ Ocean at  levels of above 350 ppm resulted in 100 % mortality of all Artemia live stages. The pH of the treated sea water is slightly reduced from pH 8.2 to 6.1, due to the acidic properties of Peracleanâ Ocean.  Further experiments were carried out with a number of indicator organisms. The results of these tests are presented in the paper.

1Degussa AG, Rodenbacher Chaussee 4, D-63457 Hanau-Wolfgang, Germany

Tel: +49 6181-59-3892, Fax: +49 6181-59-3311, Email: rainer-g.fuchs@degussa.com, Web: www.degussa.com

2Dr Voigt Consulting

Email: m.voigt@drvoigt-consulting.de


Ballast Water Treatment with Currently Available Biocides

William E. McCracken

In early 2000, legislation was introduced in the Michigan Senate to require ballast water sterilization and authorization by permit for discharge in Michigan waters.  Shortly thereafter, Michigan’s Governor proposed establishing a Ballast Water Task Force, under the auspices of the Council of Great Lakes Governors. 

Regulators are hearing that there was no known method to treat ballast water to remove or kill foreign species.  Therefore, to provide important information to the Council of Great Lakes Governors Task Force, the Director of the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, established a Ballast Water Work Group (BWWG), with a stated goal of determining “the best way currently available to get ballast water introductions of exotic species stopped in 12 months.”  The 12-month time frame was established to ensure that the focus would remain on what is currently available, not what might be available in the future.  Although the 12 months has passed, the focus is still on what is currently available, and the need to provide answers is intensely felt.

Since its establishment, the BWWG has concluded that the only currently available methods of improving the control of invasive aquatic species in ballast water are improved management practices and biocides.  Also, the list of biocides considered to be potentially “currently available” has been narrowed to three, hypochlorite (chlorine), gluteraldehyde and copper ion. 

The BWWG has determined that shipboard testing of the three selected biocides should be carried out.  This is needed to demonstrate whether they are practical for general application in foreign ships operating in the Great Lakes.  A grant was awarded for the testing of gluteraldehyde and that work is ongoing.  For hypochlorite and copper ion, Michigan is now preparing a Request for Proposal (RFP) to carry out the on‑board testing.  This paper addresses that portion of the overall Michigan “project.”  The timeframe for that work is the 2001 shipping season.  The results are expected to be provided to the Council of Great Lakes Governors Task Force following the shipping season.

William E. McCracken, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 30273, Lansing MI 48909-7773, United States of America

Tel: +1 517-335-4114, Fax: +1 517-241-8133, Email: mccrackw@state.mi.us


Great Lakes Ballast Technology Demonstration Project

Allegra A. Cangelosi, Ivor T. Knight, Mary Balcer, David Wright, Rodger Dawson, Chip Blatchley, Donald Reid, Nicole Mays & Jessica Taverna

The experiments reported here were designed to describe and compare the biological effectiveness of commercially-available approaches to mechanical/physical treatment of ballast water: automatic backwash screen filtration (ABSF), cyclonic separation (CS), and ultraviolet radiation (UV), alone and in combination with each other. The tests examine the systems’ abilities to kill, remove, or impede reproduction of organisms in ballast water. To better describe effectiveness, extensive physical and biological tests were conducted at two scales. All treatments were analyzed on a stationary barge-based experimental platform at 1500 USGPM. The CS system was analyzed in the shipboard context in an engine-room installation of an operating passenger vessel – MV Regal Princess (Princess Cruise Lines), at 880 USGPM. The ABSF was analyzed in a shipboard context in a deck installation on an operating bulk cargo carrier, the MV Algonorth.

All treatments were analyzed at two time intervals following treatment (0 and 18-24 hours), and several locations with varied physical/chemical source water characteristics (two barge sites in Lake Superior, various MV Regal Princess locations along the north Pacific coast of the US and Canada, various MV Algonorth locations in the Great Lakes). The barge-based tests illuminated system effectiveness in a high flow, yet controlled experimental context. The ship-board tests provided a real-world assessment of treatment in the context of an operating ballast system. While not all-encompassing, the combination of biological findings reported here provide a strong indication of the overall effectiveness of the systems with respect to bacteria, viruses, phytoplankton and zooplankton. Though the full-scale flow-rate for the passenger ship is low compared to cargo ships, the experiments are especially informative as to interactions between ballast systems and the biota in treated and untreated water, and the extent to which efficacy results from a barge platform may be translatable to effectiveness in a ship.

Allegra A. Cangelosi, Northeast-Midwest Institute, 218 D St. SE, Washington, DC 20003, United States of America

Tel: +1 202 544 5200, Fax: +1 202 544 0043, Email: acangelo@nemw.org, Web: www.nemw.org


Testing of Ballast Water Treatment Technologies at Large Scale

Thomas D. Waite, Junko Kazumi, Linda Farmer, Thomas R. Capo, Peter Lane, Gary Hitchcock, Sharon L. Smith & Steven G. Smith.

The two main aims of this project are to: 1) construct a facility to test treatment options for ballast water at large scale, and 2) conduct experiments to measure and verify efficacy of mechanical treatment (self-cleaning strainers and hydrocyclones) followed by physical treatment  (UV light) on killing or removing marine organisms and microorganisms. 

The construction of the Ballast Water Treatment Test Facility at the Rosensteil School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences (RSMAS), University of Miami, with an operational system for the self-cleaning strainer coupled with the UV unit, was completed in February, 2001.  Testing commenced February 2001 and will conclude by June 2001. 

The treatment test facility is located a short distance onshore from the pump.  Holding tanks of 200 gallons (approximately 750 liters) were installed at three sample points within the pilot plant.  Specifically, sampling points are located before and after the mechanical treatment, and before and after the physical treatment (UV).  These tanks allowed for the collection of samples to evaluate the organisms either retained or passing the representative unit operations.  In addition, a 30 gal (approximately 115 liter) tank was installed at the head of the treatment facility, along with a high pressure injection pump to augment turbidity. 

A Hayward Strain-o-Matic® Self-Cleaning Strainer was selected for testing as the first mechanical treatment process in the pilot plant.  A carbon steel and stainless steel unit Model No. 596 was installed, including a 50 µm stainless steel screen.  A Krebs Model KSH-20 Desander hydrocyclone was selected for testing as the second mechanical treatment process.  This hydrocyclone was selected for demonstration as it has already been tested for the removal of zebra mussel larvae. 

After the mechanical treatment process, a secondary UV treatment process was tested.  A full-scale UV system designed by Wedeco-Ideal Horizons, Inc., included a unit containing 60 low pressure lamps with an estimated dosage of 30,000 µm Ws/cm2 at 60% service capacity.  It was anticipated that this design allowed for the most efficient UV treatment of ballast water possible.  Preliminary data indicates that UV is unlikely to be suitable as an effective ballast water treatment option.

Dr. Thomas D. Waite, College of Engineering, University of Miami, 1251 Memorial Drive, Coral Gables, Florida 33146, United States of America

Tel: +1 305 284 2908, Fax: +1 305 284 2885, Email: twaite@miami.edu


Shipboard Trials of Ballast Water Treatment Systems by Maritime Solutions

Richard Fredricks, Jeffrey Miner & Christopher Constantine

Maritime Solutions Inc., a private US company, has received major from the State of Maryland Port Administration and the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) to support the rigorous testing of the its patent pending ballast water treatment system.  The programme seeks to demonstrate whether the system is a safe, effective, economical, energy efficient and crew friendly shipboard treatment system as an effective alternative to the troubled practice of ballast exchange.

Maritime Solutions, working in cooperation with the University of Maryland, has additionally won the support of the U.S. Maritime Administration to allow the testing programme to take place aboard the 39,000 dead weight tonne Cape May, a ship of the U.S. Ready Reserve fleet.  Berthed in the Port of Baltimore, it will provide for realistic shipboard testing taking water from Chesapeake Bay.

The Maritime Solutions' ballast water treatment system consists of two stages; a first stage patented ‘voraxial’ separator and a second stage treatment of ultraviolet (UV) irradiation or, alternatively, the chemical biocide Seakleen or PeracleanOcean.

This paper presents results from work to date.

Maritime Solutions Inc., 17 Battery Place, Suite 913, New York, NY 10004, United States of America

Tel: +1 212 747 9044, Fax: +1 212 747 9240, Email: info@maritimesolutionsinc, Web: www.maritimesolutions.com


Effects of Cyclonic Separation and UV Treatment 

Terri Sutherland1, Colin Levings, Shane Petersen & Wayne Hesse

The Integrated Cyclone-UV Treatment System (ITS) was designed by Velox Technology Inc. as a prototype test apparatus to simulate treatment of ballast water. The ITS contains two separate treatment phases: 1) cyclonic pre-treatment and 2) ultraviolet radiation (UV) treatment. The cyclonic separation phase consists of a single housing, which contains 3 parallel cyclone tube apparatii (patent-pending). Each cyclone tube immediately generates high centrifugal forces and imparts a gravitational force on suspended particulates as water passes through each tube. The centrifugal force is derived from the conversion of potential energy of the process stream to kinetic energy at the separator’s feed inlet. The gravitational force (G) imparted on suspended particulates varies depending upon the mass and kinetic strength of each particle. Since variations in the size, mass, and exoskeleton structure existed for the targeted species, differences in the kinetic strength of each species would differ along with mortality estimates. The pre-treatment cyclonic apparatus utilized for this study was designed to operate at a pressure drop of 7 to 10 PSIG.  

Because higher-density and usually larger-sized particles have significantly higher centrifugal forces imparted upon them, “heavier particles” tend to migrate to the outer wall while travelling down the length of each tube before exiting out the post-solids outlet (PS). Thus, two distinct size fractions are discharged through separate outlets located at the distal ends of the cyclonic housing. After cyclonic pre-treatment, the post-cyclone (PC) pre-treated water flows to the secondary treatment stage through to the ultraviolet (UV) chamber which may contain up to 8 UV-C lamps. The UV test chamber provided allowed for the experiments to be conducted utilizing two different UV-C lamp sizes and (nominal) wattages.  For this study, combinations of 39W and 120W lamps were used to generate the UV dosages necessary for the experiments.

Treatment experiments were carried out between October, 1999, and January, 2000, at the West Vancouver Laboratory, West Vancouver, British Columbia (Fisheries and Oceans Canada).  The paper presents results from this work.

1 Fisheries and Oceans Canada , West Vancouver Laboratory, 4160 Marine Drive , West Vancouver , British Columbia V7V 1N6 , Canada

Tel: +1 604 666 8537 , Fax: +1 604 666 3497 , Email: sutherlandt@pac.dfo-mpo.gc.ca , Web: www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca


The OptiMarin System

Birgir Nilsen, Halvor Nilsen & Tom Mackey

The paper reviews the OptiMar Ballast System a possible practical solution to the treatment of ballast water.  It examines the treatment of ballast water using solids separation as a pre-treatment and UV light as the primary on-board treatment of ballast water.  The various components of the system are presented and described including improvements based on the experience gathered from the project.  The installation of an OptiMar Ballast System aboard the cruise ship Regal Princess is discussed.  The conclusions of the results of the various testing of the system both prior to and after the full-scale shipboard installation are presented. We refer to the respective reports for detailed findings and results.

OptiMarin AS, 190 Henry Street, Bldg 18, Stamford, CT 06902, United States of America

Tel: +1 203 973 0678, Fax: +1 413 683 3240, Email bnilsen@optimarin.com, Web: www.ballastwater.com or www.optimarin.com


Ballast Water Treatment R&D Activities on North American Pacific Coast

Scott Smith

Numerous international, national, regional and local groups are discussing ways to minimize the spread of invasive species from ballast water.  Everyone is hampered by the same set of problems.  Creating a practical and effective ballast water discharge standard is complicated by the vast diversity of organisms found in ballast water.  Ballast water treatment is new and rapidly evolving with many promising technologies, but none that have been widely proven in the varied world of shipboard operations.  Ballast water treatment testing facilities have not been available for long-term standardized testing of technology effectiveness.  The production and installation of new treatment technologies is hampered by the lack of a standard.  The US National Invasive Species Act states that any form of treatment must be as good or better than ballast exchange, which unintentionally complicates the establishment of a standard because of the difficulty in defining the varying effectiveness of exchange.  Salinity testing is the current method of evaluating exchange and is regarded as ineffective.  All of these interrelated problems need to be addressed in a manner that promotes consensus for a unified state, national, and international ballast water management program.

The Pacific Ballast Water Treatment Pilot Project was established to cooperatively conduct ballast water research of common interest to the International Maritime Organization, U.S. Coast Guard, British Columbia, and the US Pacific states of California, Oregon, Washington and Alaska.  Researching new methods to stop invasive species introductions from ballast water unites the project partners in a common goal.  The ambitious efforts undertaken in this project are beyond the ability of any single member.  By combining resources, we increase our ability to solve problems that impede the development of a comprehensive and effective ballast water management program. 

A research team has been formed to cooperatively conduct the research undertaken in this project with guidance from advisory teams.  Each team member focuses on a specific project, yet each adds their expertise to the development of all project components.   The team members are from diverse backgrounds providing a balance of scientific, professional and political perspectives.  The diversity of team members is intended to insure that our results will be scientifically defensible, practical and widely accepted. 

The Project objectives include the building of a ballast water research facility for pilot scale testing, shipboard installations for full-scale testing, establishment of standardized testing protocols, a recommended interim standard for ballast discharges, and a recommended monitoring protocol to verify the effectiveness of ballast water exchange.   Individual project results will be submitted to various journals for publication and combined together into one comprehensive project report.

Scott Smith, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, United States of America

Email: smithss@dfw.wa.gov


Ballast Water Treatment R&D Activities in Japan

Takeaki Kikuchi, Katsumi Yoshida & Beatriz Casareto

Research and development efforts have been made in various countries in the world to develop techniques to replace the exchange of ballast water.  Japan is developing at present a new technique using a special pipe.  This pipe, being simple in its structure, physically destroy particles existing in sea water.  The device is planned to be integrated into the ballast pipe system, for sterilization of sea water through its passage during ballasting and/or deballasting operations.  This method can be adopted without changing usual ballasting operations, being not necessary extra energy supply or special maintenance.  Japan considers the method excellent since it is environmentally harmless, easy in maintenance and economical in operation.  In this paper. we report the pipe method on the basis of results got on land experiment, and a comparison with other methods as ozone treatment and dark storage effects.  This research was carried out from 1999 to 2000.

The Japan Association of Marine Safety, 17-1 Toranomon 1-Chrome, Minato-Ku, Tokyo 105-0001, Japan

Tel: +81 3 3502 3543, Fax: +81 3 3581 6136, Email: kikuti@oak.ocn.ne.jp


Simulations of Ballast Water Treatment 

Professor Arne E Holdř

 

Ballast water treatment is a major issue for the design of new ships and the redesign of present ships so that they can comply with current ballast water management guidelines and regulations and the forthcoming international convention on ballast water management.

The research at the University of Hertfordshire related to this area has been concerned with the simulation of three aspects of Ballast Water treatment:

Modelling of ballast water exchange in open ocean away from territorial waters or flow-through ballast water exchange.

  • Modelling of a ballast water separator performance based on the Optimar design

  • Optimisation of flow paths for the application of UV treatment of ballast water

Results from this work suggest that a combination of some of these methods can give a very high species removal, whilst the first two methods can be very effective on heir own. The chosen method(s) would depend on ship design and requirements for water exchange or species/ micro-organism removal. The studies carried out at Hatfield have utilized Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) methods based on the software suite Phoenics from CHAM Ltd in Wimbledon. It is argued that using such methods at an early stage of the ship design or modification can save building costs many times the costs of such analysis.

Professor Arne E Holdo, Fluid Mechanics Research Group, Department of Aerospace, Automotive and Environmental Engineering , University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL10 9A, United Kingdom

Tel: +44-1707-284272, Fax: +44-1707-285086, Email: a.e.holdo@herts.ac.uk


Ballast System Design for Flow-through Exchange

Graeme Armstrong

Ballast water exchange is currently recommended as the main ballast water management measure in IMO guidelines, the US National Invasive Species Act and other legislation, regulations and guidelines, even though its effectiveness is not finally resolved. At present it is the best available approach.  Exchange by means of emptying and refilling tanks would be preferred but this may not always be achievable due to considerations of stability, longitudinal stress limits, and the possibility of damage due to sloshing in partially filled tanks.

This leads to consideration of the alternative of flushing the tanks with at least three times the tank volume (flow-through exchange), as an alternative to complete emptying and refilling.  Most existing ships are not fitted with ballast water systems that are well suited to facilitate effective and efficient flow-through exchange.  Ballast system design modifications may be required.

This paper presents a detailed design of a ballast system to permit continuous flow-through exchange of ballast water, as investigated for the 190,000 dwt P&O bulk carrier Ormond, which trades between Europe, Brazil, Japan and Australia. 

Graeme Armstrong, Three Quays Marine Services, 12-20 Camomile Street, London EC3A 7AS, United Kingdom

Tel: +44 20 7929 2299, Fax: +44 20 7929 1650, Email: Enquiries@threequays.com


Ship Design Considerations to Facilitate Ballast Water Management

Alan Taylor1 & Geoff Rigby2

This review covers the use of all current published ballast water management and treatment options and looks at ship design enhancement to facilitate the minimisation of the risk of the introduction of harmful aquatic organisms and pathogens in ship’s ballast water and sediment discharges.

The review covers work carried out by the current authors over many years that includes operational, repair, design and research work as well as recent work reported by other  workers.

The main objective of this review has been to suggest design, operational and maintenance procedures that can be considered by shipbuilders, owners and operators that will facilitate improved management and treatment of ballast water on new and existing ships. 

The method employed was to look at the existing design of ships using best practice design aspects and operational experience related to sea chests, ballast tanks (especially strength, stability, water flow and minimisation of sediment accumulation), ballast pumps and pipework and chain lockers in relation to sediments.  This in conjunction with a review of the currently recommended precautionary practices, management measures and treatment options relating to ballast water were used to develop suggested designs, operational and maintenance procedures.

1Alan H Taylor and Associates, 59 Hillcrest Drive, Templestowe, Victoria 3106, Australia

Tel: +61 3 9846 2650, Fax:  +61 3 9846 2650, Email: aht@ahtaylor.com, Web: www.ahtaylor.com

2 Reninna Pty Limited, 36 Creswell Avenue, Charlestown, NSW 2290, Australia.

Tel: +61 2 4943 0450, Fax: +61 2 4947 8938, Email:  rigby@mail.com

Follow GloBallast on Twitter
  Global Environment Facility United Nations Development Programme International Maritime Organization
Copyright © IMO 2000-2010.
All rights reserved.