ATTACHMENT
10.
Invasive species in the Baltic Sea
Erkki Leppäkoski
Environmental and Marine Biology, Åbo Akademi University,
FIN-20500 Turku, Finland
e-mail eleppakoski@abo.fi
Being both a recipient and donor area for
nonindigenous species (NIS), the Baltic Sea has become an important node in a global
network of NIS transfers during the recent decades, thereby facilitating the process of
homogenization of the world’s aquatic fauna and flora. During the last 150 years, about
100 alien species have been recorded in the Baltic Sea, most of them being introduced
unintentionally by shipping in the ballast water tanks or by hull fouling, or spread from
their primary sites of introduction in adjacent freshwater bodies. Only a few of the NIS
recorded do behave invasively in the Baltic.
There are few and perhaps no truly
endemic species in the Baltic - its flora and fauna consist of species of varied
ecological and biogeographical origin. These include euryhaline species that have
experienced natural range expansion from the North Atlantic, relicts from previous periods
of the history of the sea, brackish and freshwater species, as well as species recently
introduced by man. Thus, being a former post-glacial lake, the Baltic has been subjected
to both spontaneous and human-aided invasion of fauna and flora over the last 10,000
years.
The brackish nature of the Baltic Sea
does not protect its waters from introductions of alien species. The biota of the Baltic
are exposed to other brackish-water biotas of the world, owing to the breakdown of
large-scale geographical barriers by ships’ traffic leading to an exchange of species.
Most of the important harbors in the world are located at river mouths or in estuaries.
The salinity range of these brackish habitats covers the oligo- and mesohaline conditions
prevailing in the Baltic. The Baltic Sea is characterized by a complicated,
three-dimensional (i.e. physical, chemical and biological) network of steep environmental
gradients. This complexity can be expected to facilitate invasions of NIS by offering a
wide range of hospitable conditions for a great variety of life forms.
In addition to its contact with the
Atlantic Ocean through the Danish Straits, the Baltic and its drainage area are
connected to the Ponto-Caspian brackish seas (Black, Azov and Caspian Seas) by rivers and
canals, which were opened since the 1770s. Thus, several geographical invasion corridors,
other than ship traffic, open into the Baltic Sea and its Gulfs. Several species of
introduced crustaceans, notably Mysidacea and Amphipoda, have spread into the coastal
lagoons of the Baltic from the adjacent freshwater bodies. Other species were introduced
intentionally through acclimatization experiments performed in the former USSR during the
1960s and 1970s, especially in the Baltic Republics, in order to improve foraging
conditions for fish; most of these species originate from the Ponto-Caspian region.
There is evidence of large-scale
biological contamination by NIS in the zoobenthic and planktonic communities of the Baltic
Sea. Introduction of NIS into the Baltic, and their further spread within the basin, has
resulted in major changes in near-shore ecosystems especially in coastal lagoons and
inlets. By contrast, hypolimnetic and pelagic regions of the Baltic have been practically
free of NIS until the 1980s. Approximately 70 NIS have been able to establish reproducing
populations in the Baltic Sea. Of the 58 unintentional introductions (including
non-established species) with more or less known dispersal history, 38 are transoceanic,
among them 19 trans-Atlantic ones of American origin. Another 18 NIS are of Ponto-Caspian
origin. After their introduction many species and their drifting pelagic larvae invade new
nearby habitats by natural dispersal (secondary introduction) via the transport by water
currents and coastal traffic.
Baltic Sea estuaries have functioned as
bridgeheads that have aided in the establishment of several NIS. The Curonian, Vistula and
Szczecin Lagoons, German Boddens, and the Neva estuary are known to host a high number of
well established NIS and can be identified as "centers of xenodiversity” along the
Baltic coasts. Based on published first findings, the minimum rates of secondary,
within-basin, spread were estimated as follows: the barnacle Balanus improvisus
from Königsberg (now Kaliningrad) (1844) to Turku (1868) 30 km·yr-1- ; the
polychaete Marenzelleria viridis from German Boddens (1985) to Lithuania (1989) 170
km·yr-1, further to South Finland (1990) 480 km·yr-1, and finally
to Northern Quark (1996) 90 km·yr-1; the gastropod Potamopyrgus antipodarum
from Wismar Bight, Germany, to Gotland (1920) 20 km·yr-1, to the Åland
Islands (1926) 50 km·yr-1, and further to the Bothnian Bay (1945) 30 km·yr-1.
Recent introductions into the Baltic
Sea
Three recent introductions into the
Baltic Sea serve as examples of the dispersal capacity of aquatic NIS. Marenzelleria
viridis, a North American polychaete, spread from the southern Baltic coastal inlets
up to the Bothnian Bay within 10 years. Hemimysis anomala, a Ponto-Caspian mysid,
first found at the entrance to the Gulf of Finland in 1992, was detected in both the
Stockholm archipelago and the inner part of the Gulf of Finland some years later. A new
cladoceran species for the Baltic, Cercopagis pengoi, an introduction from the
Black Sea area, spread from its bridgeheads in the Gulf of Finland and Gulf of Riga up to
the Northern Quark and down to the Gulf of Gdansk in less than 10 years.
Until the establishment of permanent
populations of M. viridis and C. pengoi, scientific interest in the Baltic
Sea area was mainly directed towards abundance assessment of nonindigenous species and
their invasion history, whereas their fundamental role as consumer members in and
regulators of brackish-water ecosystems, as well as their realized niches in the invaded
communities, still remain to be studied in more detail. The appearance of M. viridis
and C. pengoi contributed widely to the scientific awareness of aquatic
bioinvasions.
Recent research and development
efforts
The first risk assessment study within
the Baltic Sea area was published in 1999, including risk profiles for five northwest
European harbours along the salinity gradient from St. Petersburg (Gulf of Finland) to
Bergen (Atlantic coast of Norway). The first shipping study in the Baltic Sea was
undertaken as a part of a recently completed European research initiative, to quantify the
survival of organisms in ballast tanks during ship voyages, in 1998 onboard the Russian
Navy hydrographic ship "Sibiryakov" on its voyage from St. Petersburg to Lisbon
(Portugal) and back. With one exception, both phytoplankton and zooplankton species were
found in lower numbers at the end of the voyage than at the beginning.
Cooperation and exchange of information
on NIS in the Baltic is mainly through the Working Group on Nonindigenous Estuarine and
Marine Organisms (NEMO), established in 1994 by the Baltic Marine Biologists (a
non-governmental organisation, founded in 1968). Members of this Working Group permanently
communicate with each other, mostly by e-mail, and meet for workshops once per year.
This group with some 15 active members
works in close co-operation with representatives from intergovernmental and
non-governmental bodies such as the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea
(ICES), especially with the Working Group on Introductions and Transfers of Marine
Organisms (WGITMO), and the IMO. A database contains a list of ca. 100 introduced species
recorded in the Baltic, including information on taxonomic and common names (in different
languages), ecological group, year of first record, likely vector of introduction, origin
and references to information sources. The database is maintained by Coastal Research and
Planning Institute, Klaipeda University, Lithuania.
A Ph.D. course on Ecology of Marine and
Estuarine Introductions and Invasions was held in summer 1997 at Åbo Akademi University,
Finland, for participants from the Nordic and Baltic countries and NW Russia, with. profs.
James T. Carlton (USA) and Inger Wallentinus (Sweden), among others, as lecturers.
Harmful or beneficial invaders?
There have been a few ecological and
economic problems with NIS already established in the Baltic Sea. Most of them are
relatively benign and appear to have served to increase both species and functional
diversity in a variety of habitats. Of the NIS occurring in the coastal waters,
mainly four fouling species, the hydrozoan Cordylophora caspia, the barnacle Balanus
improvisus, the cladoceran Cercopagis pengoi and the bivalve Dreissena
polymorpha cause economic damage to fisheries, shipping, boating or fish farming, as
well as industries and power plants where cooling water from the sea is used (Table 1).
Table 1. Nuisance
species among the 100 nonindigenous species recorded in the Baltic Sea (the Kattegat
included) by April 2001. Data on origin, date of introduction and vectors mainly from
Leppäkoski and Olenin (2000a). Modified from Leppäkoski 2001.
Type of nuisance Species
Common name |
Origin |
Time of
introduction into the Baltic |
Vector |
1. Fouling of industrial
installations, water supply systems, boats, fishing gear |
|
|
|
Coscinodiscus wailesii
Centric diatom |
Indo-Pacific? |
1980s |
Shipping or associated |
Cordylophora caspia
Brakish-water hydroid |
Ponto-Caspian |
early 1800s |
Shipping, canals |
Styela clava
Leathery sea squirt |
NW Pacific |
1990s |
Shipping |
Ficopomatus enigmaticus*
A tubeworm |
S Hemi-sphere |
1950s |
Shipping |
Cercopagis pengoi
Fish hook water flea |
Ponto-Caspian |
1990s |
Shipping |
Balanus improvisus
Bay barnacle |
N America |
1840s |
Shipping |
Dreissena polymorpha
Zebra mussel |
Ponto-Caspian |
early 1800s |
Shipping, canals |
2. Preventive (antifouling)
measures needed |
|
|
|
B. improvisus |
|
|
|
C. caspia |
|
|
|
3. Impacts on fisheries,
boating and recreational qualities |
|
|
|
Sargassum muticum
Jap weed |
SE Asia |
1980s |
Associated |
Elodea canadensis*
Canadian waterweed |
N America |
1870s |
Ornamental |
C. pengoi |
|
|
|
Eriocheir sinensis
Chinese mitten crab |
SE Asia |
1920s |
Shipping |
4. Parasites or pests on
fish and shellfish |
|
|
|
Pseudodactylogyrus spp.
Gill parasitic monogeneans |
Pacific |
1980s |
Associated |
Anguillicola crassus
Swim-bladder nematode |
SE Asia |
1980s |
Associated |
Crepidula fornicata*
Slipper limpet |
N America |
1940s |
Associated |
5. Damage caused to wooden
objects (boring) |
|
|
|
Teredo navalis
Ship worm |
SE Asia? |
1700s |
Shipping |
6. Impacts on water quality;
hygienic (toxic) risks |
|
|
|
Alexandrium tamarense
Dinoflagellate |
Unknown |
Unknown |
Shipping |
Gyrodinium spp.
Dinoflagellate |
Unknown |
1980s |
Shipping |
Gymnodinium spp.
Dinoflagellate |
Unknown |
1990s |
Shipping |
Branta canadensis
Canada goose |
N America |
1930s |
Stocking |
7.Damage caused to
agriculture from overgrazing |
|
|
|
B.canadensis |
|
|
|
8. Damage caused to shores
(burrowing) |
|
|
|
E. sinensis* |
|
|
|
Ondatra zibethicus
Muskrat |
N America |
1920s |
Stocking |
9. Damage caused to target
species for hunting |
|
|
|
Mustela vison
American mink |
N America |
1920s |
Escapee |
*) negligible in brackish water
With the recent invasions and mass
occurrences of M. viridis and C. pengoi in the 1990s, the Baltic Sea entered
into a new era in its invasion history. However, ecological impacts of these species are
not well understood and require further investigation. An essential component of this new
era of invasion biology in the Baltic ought to incorporate a process-oriented approach
consisting in parallel of field observations and experimental studies. As well, further
information is required to fully document economic consequences of biological invasions,
including direct and indirect loss of fisheries production and inpacts on tourism
business.
Jellyfishes in the Baltic Sea
The jellyfish fauna of the Baltic is poor
in species. In the Baltic proper (surface salinity 6-8 PSU), three species only of
Scyphozoa and Ctenophora can be found (Table 2). In addition, the hydromedusa Maeotias
inexpectata (M. marginata), native to the Black Sea basin, appeared in the
western Estonian waters, NE Baltic proper, in 1999. Maeotias is known as an invader
also from the Loire estuary in France, and from both the Atlantic and Pacific coasts of
North America.
With regard to its salinity and
temperature range, introduction of Mnemiopsis leidyi into the Baltic is likely. The
probability of mass occurrence is low due to the low summer temparatures of the surface
waters of the Baltic proper, normally not exceeding 17 C. However, the eutrophicated and
warmer coastal lagoons of the southern Baltic are at obvious risk.
Table 2. Jellyfishes
in the Baltic Sea from the entrance area (Kattegat, approx. 20 PSU) to the Gulf of Bothnia
(5 to 3 PSU).
Species |
Katte-gat |
SW Baltic |
Baltic proper |
N Baltic |
Gulf of Bothnia |
SCYPHOZOA |
|
|
|
|
|
Haliclystus
auricula |
X |
X |
|
|
|
Lucernaria
quadricornis |
X |
X |
|
|
|
Aurelia aurita |
X |
X |
X |
X |
Occ. |
Cyanea capillata |
X |
X |
X |
Occ. |
|
C. lamarckii |
X |
X |
|
|
|
Chrysaora
hysoscella |
X |
|
|
|
|
Rhizostoma cf.
pulmo |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HYDROZOA - HYDROMEDUSAE |
|
|
|
|
|
Maeotias
marginata |
|
|
|
1999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CTENOPHORA |
|
|
|
|
|
Beroe cucumis |
X |
X |
|
|
|
B. gracilis |
X |
|
|
|
|
Bolinopsis
infundibulum |
X |
|
|
|
|
Pleurobrachia
pileus |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
Most of the NIS of brackish- or
freshwater origin in the Baltic originate from warmer areas. Therefore, even slight
changes in the temperature and salinity conditions (e.g. due to changes in inflow and
outflow through the Danish Straits) may influence the invasion pattern and population
dynamics of non-native species. If the process of global warming continues, the risks that
warm water species become established in the Baltic Sea will increase.
Further reading
Baltic Sea Alien Species Database 2001.
Baltic Marine Biologists’ Working Group on Non-indigenous Estuarine and Marine
Organisms. Olenin, S. & E. Leppäkoski (eds). http://www.ku.lt/nemo/mainnemo.htm
Gollasch, S. & E. Leppäkoski 1999.
Initial Risk Assessment of Alien Species in Nordic Coastal Waters. Nord 1999:8.
Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen. 244 pp.
Gollasch, S. & R. Mecke 1996.
Eingeschleppte Organismen. In: Warnsignale aus der Ostsee. J. L. Lozan, R. Lampe, W.
Matthäus, E. Rachor, H. Rumohr & H. v. Westernhagen (eds). Parey Buchverlag, Berlin,
pp. 146-150.
Jansson, K. 1994. Alien species in the
marine environment. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. Report 4357, 67 pp.
Jansson, K. 2000. The marine environment.
In: Weidema, I.R. (ed) Introduced Species in the Nordic Countries. Nord 2000:13. Nordic
Council of Ministers, Copenhagen, pp 43-86.
Leppäkoski, E. 2001. Harmful non-native
species in the Baltic Sea - an ignored problem. In: 'Baltic Coastal Ecosystems: Structure,
Function and Coastal Zone Management’. Central and Eastern European Development Studies,
Springer Verlag (in press).
Leppäkoski, E. & S. Olenin 2000a.
Non-native species and rates of spread: lessons from the brackish Baltic Sea. Biological
Invasions 2, 151-163.
Leppäkoski, E. & S. Olenin 2000b.
Xenodiversity of the European brackish water seas: the North American contribution. In:
Pederson, J. (ed) Marine Bioinvasions:
Proceedings of the First National
Conference, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, January
24-27, 1999, pp. 107-119.
Olenin, S. & E. Leppäkoski 1999.
Non-native animals in the Baltic Sea: alteration of benthic habitats in coastal inlets and
lagoons. Hydrobiologia 393, 23-243.
Olenin, S., S. Gollasch, S. Jonusas &
I. Rimkute 2000. En-route investigations of plankton in ballast water on a
ships´ voyage from the Baltic Sea to the open Atlantic coast of Europe. International
Review of Hydrobiology 85, 577-596.
Regional Biological Invasions Center -
Group on Aquatic Alien Species (GAAS) http://www.zin.ru/projects/invasions/gaas/
Väinölä, R. & P. Oulasvirta 2001. The first record
of Maeotias marginata (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa) from the Baltic Sea: a Pontocaspian
invader. Sarsia (in press).
|