|   1st International Ballast Water Treatment R&D 
  SymposiumIMO London 26-27 March 2001 Abstracts     This document contains the Abstracts of papers presented at the 1st 
  International Ballast Water Treatment R&D Symposium held at IMO in London 
  on 26 and 27 March 2001. Abstracts are listed in order presented according to 
  the symposium programme.  
 Ballast Water Treatment – An Overview of Options Alan Taylor1 & Geoff Rigby2 This review covers essentially all of the ballast water management and treatment 
  options that have practical significance at the present time. These include 
  ballast water exchange, heating, filtration, hydrocyclones, ultraviolet irradiation, 
  chemicals, use of fresh or treated water and shore based or dedicated ship treatment. The review covers work that has been reported over the past 10 years and up 
  to the present time. This project has only recently been completed.  The main objective of this work has been to review the current status and technical 
  effectiveness of appropriate treatment technologies and to develop indicative 
  cost data for use of these options as a basis for comparison and selection by 
  ship owners and operators. For the cost comparisons, the project considers three 
  ship sizes; a Cape Size Bulk Carrier, an LNG Carrier and a Container Vessel. Details of the various techniques, together with the cost comparisons that 
  have been used in the studies are summarised in the complete report.  1Alan H Taylor and Associates , 59 Hillcrest Drive, Templestowe, 
  Victoria 3106 , Australia Tel: +61 3 9846 2650, Fax:  +61 3 9846 2650, Email: aht@ahtaylor.com 
  , Web: www.ahtaylor.com  2 Reninna Pty Limited, 36 Creswell Avenue , Charlestown, NSW 2290, 
  Australia. Tel: +61 2 4943 0450 , Fax: +61 2 4947 8938, Email:  rigby@mail.com 
 
   Ballast Water Treatment by Filtration  
 Jose T. Matheickal1, Thomas. D. Waite2 
  & Sam T. Mylvaganam1  Singapore Environmental  Technology Institute (ETI), in collaboration with the Maritime and Port Authority 
  of Singapore (MPA) and National University of Singapore (NUS) has been working 
  on a multi-faceted R&D project on ballast water treatment. One of the objectives 
  of this programme is to develop an effective ballast water treatment system 
  for onboard use.  The primary treatment 
  system being considered is based on screen filtration technology. Various secondary 
  treatment options such as UV, ultrasonic and biocides are also being studied 
  to compliment the filtration process. This paper focuses on screening technology. 
 Screen filtration 
  has been in use for over 20 years with screens having filtration capabilities 
  of 40 micron and larger. Advances in manufacturing technology of woven or slotted 
  stainless steel screen over the last decade have enabled filters to remove particles 
  down to 10-micron range.  Automatic self-cleaning screen filtration is 
  gaining popularity now as they have a small footprint even for filtration, including 
  large flow rates, and are simple to operate and less complex in terms of piping 
  and valving. The backwash water loss can be as low as 1% of the total throughput 
  volume.  Screen filtration systems have 
  been previously tested using ship-mounted and barge-mounted ballast filtration 
  systems. Also, a clear consensus is emerging that several alternative technological 
  options for pathogen inactivation (e.g., UV, ultrasound) would require a pre-filtration 
  stage for effective removal of larger particles in ballast water.  This paper presents the results 
  of the research carried out at Singapore ETI to date.  The studies show 
  that self-cleaning screen filtration is a potentially effective treatment technology 
  for ballast water management. The studies also showed that technologies that 
  are currently available ‘off-the-shelf’, are not designed to meet the requirements 
  of normal ballasting operations. Considerable modifications and system re-engineering 
  will have to be made to develop a dedicated ballast water filtration system. 
 1 Environmental Technology Institute, Innovation Centre (NTU), Unit 
  237, Block 2,  18 Nanyang Drive, Singapore 637723  Tel: +65 7941556, Fax: +65 7921291, Email: 
  jtmat h@rti.org.sg, Web: www.eti.org.sg 
 2 College of Engineering, University of Miami, 1251 Memorial Drive, 
  Coral Gables, Florida 33146, United States of America Tel: +1 305 284 2908 , Fax: +1 305 284 2885  Email: twaite@miami.edu 
 
 Ballast Water Treatment by Ozonation  
 Aage Bjřrn Andersen, Egil Dragsund & Bjřrn Olaf Johannessen 
 Ozone is used for disinfection in a number of applications ranging from grey 
  water treatment, treatment of potable water and those related to industrialised 
  processes such as aquaculture, and electricity production.  These areas 
  of application involve fresh water. Ballast water may be  fresh-, brackish 
  or salt water. The introduction of ions present in seawater changes the mechanisms 
  associated with ozonation. The use of ozone as a treatment of ballast water 
  has been considered by review of relevant literature and laboratory testing 
  of:  
 
  
    Efficiency of ozone disinfection 
   Oxidant decay rates in sea water  Corrosivity of ozone treated sea water This work 
  was initiated by Barber Ship Management and undertaken with funding from the 
  Norwegian Research Council.  Aage Bjřrn Andersen  Det Norske Veritas, Veritasveien 1, N-1322 Hřvik, Norway  Tel: +47 67 579900, Fax: +47 67 579911, Email: Aage.Bjorn.Andersen@dnv.com 
   Ballast Water Treatment by Heat – An Overview    Geoff Rigby1, Alan Taylor2 and 
  Gustaaf Hallegraeff3  This review covers the use of waste heat from a ship’s main 
  engine to kill harmful organisms.  The review covers work carried out by the authors over the past years as well 
  as recent work reported by other workers. The main objective of the review has 
  been to assess, evaluate and demonstrate the option of heating ballast water 
  to a temperature sufficiently high to minimise or eliminate the translocation 
  of harmful organisms.   The pioneering work in this 
  area was based on time-temperature laboratory studies and shipboard trials with 
  Gymnodinium catenatum 
  cysts and other phytoplankton algae by Bolch and Hallegraeff (1993);  
  Rigby (1994) and Hallegraeff (1998) together with thermodynamic analyses of 
  available heat from the main engine of the 140,000 DWT BHP bulk Carrier, Iron 
  Whyalla by Rigby and Taylor (1993) to assess the various modes of heating. 
  This work resulted in the development of an optimum arrangement for international 
  voyages where the hot water from the main engine cooling circuit is flushed 
  through each tank (Figure 1). Full scale ship trials were undertaken to confirm 
  predictions (Rigby et al., 1998, 1999). 
  In addition to these studies, a number of other options involving the recirculation 
  of water through additional heat exchangers utilising waste heat and steam (in 
  some cases) have been proposed.  The findings of these studies are summarised 
  in this paper.  1 Reninna Pty Limited, 36 Creswell Avenue, Charlestown, NSW 2290, 
  Australia.  Tel: +61 2 4943 0450, Fax: +61 2 4947 8938, Email:  rigby@mail.com 
 2Alan H Taylor and Associates, 59 Hillcrest Drive, Templestowe, 
  Victoria 3106, Australia  Tel: +61 3 9846 2650, Fax:  +61 3 9846 2650, Email: aht@ahtaylor.com, 
  Web: www.ahtaylor.com  3Department of Plant Science, University of Tasmania, GPO Box 252 
  -55, Hobart, Tasmania 7001 , Australia  Tel: +61 3 6226 2623, Fax: +61 3 6226 2698, Email: Hallegraeff@plant.utas.edu.au 
 
 Ballast Water Treatment by Heat – EU Shipboard Trials  Peilin Zhou & Vassilios Lagogiannis  This paper reports on one component 
  of the EU-funded research project ‘On Board Treatment of Ballast Water (Technologies 
  Development and Applications) and Application of Low-sulphur Marine Fuel 
  (MARTOB)’   All ballast water treatment options 
  will be examined and analysed at the initial stage of the project, six of which 
  will be further investigated in laboratories and subsequent sea trials. The 
  six treatment methods are; high temperature treatment, biological de-oxygenation, 
  combination of UV/US, ozone treatment, hydrogen peroxide treatment (oxicide 
  method) and hurdle technology.  The project will run over three years, 
  commencing from the beginning of 2001.  The main outputs of the project 
  will be:  
  
    Comprehensive documents with detailed description of individual treatment 
      methods. The documents will present all facts necessary for ship operators 
      to make a rational choice of ballast water management strategy. 
    Treatment equipment, system designs and design tools, ready for commercial 
      application on the completion of the project. 
    Reports and recommendations to the European Commission, ICES, IOC, shipowner 
      associations, and other public domains, including regional bodies such HELCOM, 
      OSPARCOM and BBCMBS, and further to influence IMO regulations through governmental 
      authorities. The reports and recommendations will address limitations of 
      ballast water treatment onboard ships, environmental, economic impacts, 
      risk and safety issues.  The project consists of six work 
  packages from state of the art research to technical development, laboratory 
  test/demonstration, full-scale sea trials and results dissemination and recommendations.  
 The research consortium comprises 
  25 partners from Europe including expertise from academic, marine consultants, 
  research institutes, equipment manufacturers, classification societies, shipowner 
  associations and shipping companies.  This specific paper presents the 
  results of a Feasibility study on a thermal plant installation on an oil 
  taker.  The main objective of the feasibility study is to conduct a 
  preliminary design of an apparatus that will perform rapid heat treatment for 
  the incoming ballast water of an oil tanker. Based on the results of this study 
  and design, a cost analysis is performed along with conclusions and recommendations 
  for further development of such a system. Dr. Peilin Zhou, Dept. of Ship and Marine Technology, University of Strathclyde, 
  100 Montrose Street, Glasgow G4 0LZ, Scotland Tel: +44 141 548 3344, Fax: +44 141 552 2879, Email: peilin.zhou@strath.ac.uk 
 Ballast Water Treatment by Heat – NZ Shipboard Trials    Doug Mountfort  (Paper/Abstract not available before the 
  symposium)  Dr Douglas Opie Mountfort , Senior Scientist , Cawthron 
  Institute , 98 Halifax Street East , Private Bag 2 , Nelson , New Zealand  Tel: +64 3 548 2319 , Fax: +64 3 546 9464 , Email: doug@cawthron.org.nz 
  , Web: www.cawthron.org.nz  
 Ballast Water Treatment by De-Oxygenation (the AquaHabiStat™ 
  System)  Wilson J. Browning, Jr. & Wilson J. Browning III  This paper presents on a mechanical, 
  72 ton per hour high speed ballast water treatment system that uses a vacuum 
  chamber to remove dissolved oxygen from ballast water resulting in a 10-day 
  low oxygen condition within the ballast tank/ballast hold (the AquaHabiStat™ 
  System)  The prototype research is completed and consisted of three 
  10-day time series tests during the northern summer of 2000 and two 10-day time 
  series in December 2000.  The research aimed to measure the effect of high 
  speed vacuum oxygen removal over time, and to create a low cost, high performance 
  full- size ballast water treatment system.  Research methods involved the removal of dissolved oxygen 
  with utilizing a vacuum chamber over time and assessment of bio-effectiveness 
  using microscopic counts and ATP biomass measurements.  Generally, the biological results 
  from microscopic analysis of the treatment of ballast water show an immediate 
  kill of live zooplankton between 50-75%, and a nearly complete reduction within 
  two days of treatment. Under the ATP total biomass analysis, ATP levels showed 
  an average of 86% reduction down to 10 microns in ten days. Ten days was the 
  target time for all treatment, as the shortest ballast voyage from Europe to 
  the East Coast of the United States.    Browning Transport Management, Inc., 127 Bank Street, Norfolk, Virginia 23510, 
  United States of America  Tel: +1 757-6222-3321, Fax: +1 757-625-7456, Email will@wjbrowning.com 
  / leslie@wjbrowning.com 
 
 Ballast Water Treatment by Multiwave Lamps  Ben F. Kalisvaart  Ultraviolet (UV) light has become 
  widely accepted for the disinfection of potable water, process water and wastewater 
  as an alternative to chlorination. A potential new application is UV treatment 
  of ballast water.  To avoid the failure of a UV 
  disinfection system due to the recovery of micro-organisms, certain additional 
  wavelengths in the UV area are emitted by newly developed UV lamps. To reduce 
  the chance of microbial recovery after ultraviolet irradiation, damage must 
  be inflicted in as many areas of the micro-organism as possible.  The effective killing of micro-organisms 
  by polychromatic high intensity medium pressure UV lamps is due to their exceptionally 
  high UV energy output at specific wavelengths across a broad section of the 
  UV spectrum. The combination of these properties results in several different 
  lethal effects in small and large micro-organisms. Important biological molecules 
  other than DNA are likely to be damaged, which helps to prevent the recovery 
  of irradiated micro-organisms.  Absorption line spectra of absorbing 
  nucleotide bases, DNA and other biological molecules including proteins and 
  enzymes show how effective UV light can be. Recent findings on the biological 
  effects of short wavelengths on Bacillus subtilis, Cryptosporidium parvum and Escherichia coli confirms 
  the effect of short wavelengths. Practical comparisons with conventional low 
  pressure UV lamps at equal UV dosages show better killing rates from high intensity 
  medium pressure lamps, without formation of disinfection-by-products (DBPs). 
 Ben F. Kalisvaart, Berson UV-techniek, P.O.Box 90, 5670 AB Nuenen, The Netherlands 
 Tel +31 40 290 7777, Fax: +31 40 283 5755, Email: sales@bersonuv.com 
 
 Ballast Water Treatment by Electro-ionisation  Joseph Aliotta1, Andrew Rogerson2, 
  Courtney B. Campbell2 & Mark Yonge1   Electro-ionization technology 
  has been used in freshwater treatment applications but has never before been 
  tested with marine or brackish samples. A modified pilot test system was assembled 
  and used to treat marine samples containing large numbers of indigenous marine 
  organisms typical of those found in ballast water. The system consisted of a 
  holding tank (containing 300 liters of biota-rich seawater), a CLORINTM 
  gas generator and a NI-OX/LTM gas generator. These treatment components 
  together comprised the ClorinoxylTM module.   Since the bulk of the biota 
  in marine waters is small (less than 20 mm in size), test runs focused on the 
  survival of microbes, namely bacteria and protists (unicellular algae and protozoa). 
  It was assumed that the sensitivities of these microbial groups to treatment 
  reflected those of macrobiota in the water. Treatment involved exposing biota 
  to reactive species of mixed oxidant gases (O, N and Cl) in the holding tank. 
  Since rapid treatment is required by the industry, the maximum contact time 
  of any test run was 15 min. Survival curves were used to fine tune the prototype 
  system and these results were used to optimize operating parameters of the component 
  reactors,  This paper presents results 
  demonstrating that the ClorinoxylTM unit can kill over 90% of the 
  bacteria in 300 l of water within just 2-minute contact time treatment, and 
  kill all detectable organisms within just 15-minute contact time treatment. 
  Moreover, residual chlorine levels in the treated water were less than 0.3 ppm 
  when contact time treatment was short.  This first process flow design 
  is sensitive to the problems of ballast treatment systems and shows promise 
  for future systems that could be designed for shipboard application, shore-based 
  application or tender ballast treatment systems.    1Marine Environmental Partners Inc., 3001 West State Road 84, Fort 
  Lauderdale, Florida 33312 , United States of America  Tel: +1 954 791 3700, Fax: +1 954 791 2447, Email: mark@mepi.net, 
  Web: www.mepi.net  2Oceanographic Center, Nova Southeastern University, 8000 N. Ocean 
  Drive, Dania Beach, Florida 33004 , United States of America  
 Ballast Water Treatment by Gas Super-saturation    Anders Jelmert  Gas super-saturation is known 
  to affect various aquatic biota. When aquatic multicellular organisms are exposed 
  to gas supersaturated water, and especially when subsequently subjected to lowered 
  hydrostatic pressures, they may suffer from embolism and haemorrhages. If the 
  level of super-saturation is high enough, the condition may be lethal.  
  Also sub-lethal exposures represent a considerable stress to the organisms. 
  While lethal effects occasionally have been observed in natural or semi-natural 
  conditions, we have suggested it can be optimized and used to prevent the transfer 
  of unwanted organisms translocated via ballast water.  The susceptibility to gas super-saturation varies between different systematic 
  groups of organisms such as molluscs Mya 
  arenaria at 114%,  and Argopecten irridans concentricus at 116%, 
  sub-adults of the saltwater tilapia Oreochromis spilurus, at 112% , larvae 
  of the white sturgeon Acipenser transmontanus at 131%.  Results 
  from tests on the effect of gas (air and nitrogen + air mixture) supersaturated 
  seawater on the brine shrimp Artemia sp. and juveniles of the common 
  mollusc Mytilus edulis are presented. General applications, advantages 
  and limitations of the method are discussed.  Anders Jelmert , Institute of Marine Research , Austevoll Aquaculture Research 
  Station , N.5392 Storebř , Norway  Tel:  +47 56 18 03 42 , Fax: +47 56 18 03 98 , E-mail: anders.jelmert@imr.no 
 
 Seakleen®, a Potential Natural Biocide for Ballast Water 
  Treatment   David A. Wright1 & Rodger Dawson2 
   This paper reports on five years 
  of investigations into the efficacy of a new generation of natural product biocides 
  as potentially environmentally friendly, highly economical ballast water treatments. 
  Earlier work on juglone demonstrated a high degree of toxicity to a broad spectrum 
  of aquatic organisms. Toxicity is maintained in freshwater over a broad pH range, 
  and in estuarine water over a broad salinity range. More recent studies on a 
  proprietary nutricide, SEAKLEENâ (Vitamar Inc., patent approved and pending) 
  have demonstrated toxicity to a broad spectrum of marine and freshwater organisms 
  including fish larvae and eggs, planktonic crustaceans including spiny water 
  fleas, bivalve larvae (including zebra mussels), Vibrio 
  bacteria (congeneric with the cholera bacteria) and dinoflagellates including 
  dinoflagellate cysts where complete chloroplast destruction was recorded within 
  2h.  The partition coefficient of SEAKLEENâ and related compounds is approximately 
  2, meaning that they will remain in dissolved form in the face of heavy sediment 
  loads. SEAKLEENâ is toxic to the benthic amphipod Leptocheirus plumulosus, 
  thereby demonstrating its efficacy in treating residual sediment in ballast 
  tanks. In marine waters SEAKLEENâ and related compounds degrade relatively rapidly 
  to non-toxic by-products, with half-lives of 16-30h. It is anticipated that 
  ballast water discharge will not, therefore, represent a toxic threat to receiving 
  waters.   Toxicity of SEAKLEENâ to all 
  of the organisms tested was ca. 1ppm (mg L-1), indicating an effective 
  treatment dose around 1-2g. per metric tonne of ballast water. For most applications, 
  it is anticipated that SEAKLEENâ would retail at <$0.2 per metric tonne of 
  ballast water treated. No pre-treatment would be required. Dosing equipment 
  would retail @ ca. $1600.  1University of Maryland, Center for Environmental 
  Science , Chesapeake Biological Laboratory , P.O. Box 38, Solomons, MD 20688 
  , United States of America  Tel: +1 410 326 7240, Fax: +1 410 326 7210, Email: wright@cbl.umces.edu. 
 2University of Maryland, Center for Environmental Science, Chesapeake 
  Biological Laboratory, P.O. Box 38, Solomons, MD 20688 , United States of America 
 Tel: +1 (410) 326 7394, Fax: +1 (410) 326 7210, Email: dawson@chesapeake.net. 
 
 Peraclean®Ocean – a Potential Ballast Water Treatment Option 
    Rainer Fuchs1, Norbert Steiner1, Ingrid de Wilde1, 
  & Matthias Voigt2  Chemical treatment with Peracleanâ Ocean is potentially one method to effectively 
  remove organisms 
  and pathogens in ballast water. This paper summarizes the laboratory results 
  of an ongoing German research project, and provides details on the efficacy 
  and toxicological properties of Peracleanâ Ocean.  The tests of Peracleanâ Ocean as a chemical ballast water treatment 
  option are part of an ongoing research project in Germany (1998 – 2001), that 
  is funded by industry (Degussa AG) and the German Federal Ministry of Education 
  and Research with the title ‘Process for the removal of organisms from different 
  waters’[1]). 
 Peraclean® Ocean is a liquid biocide 
  formulation based 
  on peroxy 
  acetic acid (PAA) PAA containing formulations are widely used in the food and 
  beverage industry as well as in sewage treatment plants and other water treatment 
  processes. They found wide application in the treatment of cooling water and 
  as a pre-treatment of biologically contaminated waters prior to discharge into 
  the environment. PAA 
  is permitted in the USA as a 
  secondary and indirect food additive at concentrations up to 100 mg/l. 
 The shelf-life of Peracleanâ Ocean 
  is at least 1 year: more than 90% of the original activity is still present 
  after one year’s storage at room temperature. Peraclean® 
  Ocean is commercially available in 220l drums, 1 m3 IBCs or in 20 
  m3 bulk containers.   For a first evaluation of the performance of Peracleanâ Ocean, the Artemia 
  Testing Standard (ATS) was applied. This benchmark test uses the brine shrimp, 
  Artemia salina, as indicator 
  organism. The ATS involves 4 different development stages of the brine shrimp: 
  adults, larvae, nauplius-stages, pre-incubated eggs and cysts.  The ATS-data 
  showed that the addition of Peracleanâ Ocean at  levels of above 350 ppm 
  resulted in 100 % mortality of all Artemia 
  live stages. The pH of the treated sea water is slightly reduced from pH 8.2 
  to 6.1, due to the acidic properties of Peracleanâ Ocean.  Further experiments 
  were carried out with a number of indicator organisms. The results of these 
  tests are presented in the paper.  1Degussa AG, Rodenbacher Chaussee 4, D-63457 Hanau-Wolfgang, Germany 
 Tel: +49 6181-59-3892, Fax: +49 6181-59-3311, Email: 
  rainer-g.fuchs@degussa.com, Web: www.degussa.com 
 2Dr Voigt Consulting 
 Email: m.voigt@drvoigt-consulting.de 
 
 Ballast Water Treatment with Currently Available Biocides 
   William E. McCracken   In early 2000, legislation 
  was introduced in the Michigan Senate to require ballast water sterilization 
  and authorization by permit for discharge in Michigan waters.  Shortly 
  thereafter, Michigan’s Governor proposed establishing a Ballast Water Task Force, 
  under the auspices of the Council of Great Lakes Governors.   Regulators are hearing that there was no known method to treat ballast water 
  to remove or kill foreign species.  Therefore, to provide important information 
  to the Council of Great Lakes Governors Task Force, the Director of the Michigan 
  Department of Environmental Quality, established a Ballast Water Work Group 
  (BWWG), with a stated goal of determining “the best way currently available 
  to get ballast water introductions of exotic species stopped in 12 months.”  
  The 12-month time frame was established to ensure that the focus would remain 
  on what is currently available, not what might be available in the future.  
  Although the 12 months has passed, the focus is still on what is currently available, 
  and the need to provide answers is intensely felt.  Since its establishment, the BWWG has concluded that the only currently available 
  methods of improving the control of invasive aquatic species in ballast water 
  are improved management practices and biocides.  Also, the list of biocides 
  considered to be potentially “currently available” has been narrowed to three, 
  hypochlorite (chlorine), gluteraldehyde and copper ion.   The BWWG has determined that 
  shipboard testing of the three selected biocides should be carried out.  
  This is needed to demonstrate whether they are practical for general application 
  in foreign ships operating in the Great Lakes.  A grant was awarded for 
  the testing of gluteraldehyde and that work is ongoing.  For hypochlorite 
  and copper ion, Michigan is now preparing a Request for Proposal (RFP) to carry 
  out the on‑board testing.  This paper addresses that portion of the 
  overall Michigan “project.”  The timeframe for that work is the 2001 shipping 
  season.  The results are expected to be provided to the Council of Great 
  Lakes Governors Task Force following the shipping season.  William E. McCracken, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 
  30273, Lansing MI 48909-7773, United States of America  Tel: +1 517-335-4114, Fax: +1 517-241-8133, Email: mccrackw@state.mi.us 
 Great Lakes Ballast Technology Demonstration Project  Allegra A. Cangelosi, Ivor T. Knight, Mary Balcer, David 
  Wright, Rodger Dawson, Chip Blatchley, Donald Reid, Nicole Mays & Jessica 
  Taverna  The experiments reported here were designed to describe and compare the biological 
  effectiveness of commercially-available approaches to mechanical/physical treatment 
  of ballast water: automatic backwash screen filtration (ABSF), cyclonic separation 
  (CS), and ultraviolet radiation (UV), alone and in combination with each other. 
  The tests examine the systems’ abilities to kill, remove, or impede reproduction 
  of organisms in ballast water. To better describe effectiveness, extensive physical 
  and biological tests were conducted at two scales. All treatments were analyzed 
  on a stationary barge-based experimental platform at 1500 USGPM. The CS system 
  was analyzed in the shipboard context in an engine-room installation of an operating 
  passenger vessel – MV Regal Princess (Princess Cruise Lines), at 880 
  USGPM. The ABSF was analyzed in a shipboard context in a deck installation on 
  an operating bulk cargo carrier, the MV Algonorth.  All treatments were analyzed 
  at two time intervals following treatment (0 and 18-24 hours), and several locations 
  with varied physical/chemical source water characteristics (two barge sites 
  in Lake Superior, various MV Regal Princess locations along the north 
  Pacific coast of the US and Canada, various MV Algonorth locations in 
  the Great Lakes). The barge-based tests illuminated system effectiveness in 
  a high flow, yet controlled experimental context. The ship-board tests provided 
  a real-world assessment of treatment in the context of an operating ballast 
  system. While not all-encompassing, the combination of biological findings reported 
  here provide a strong indication of the overall effectiveness of the systems 
  with respect to bacteria, viruses, phytoplankton and zooplankton. Though the 
  full-scale flow-rate for the passenger ship is low compared to cargo ships, 
  the experiments are especially informative as to interactions between ballast 
  systems and the biota in treated and untreated water, and the extent to which 
  efficacy results from a barge platform may be translatable to effectiveness 
  in a ship.  Allegra A. Cangelosi, Northeast-Midwest Institute, 218 D St. SE, Washington, 
  DC 20003, United States of America  Tel: +1 202 544 5200, Fax: +1 202 544 0043, Email: acangelo@nemw.org, 
  Web: www.nemw.org  
 Testing of Ballast Water Treatment Technologies at Large 
  Scale  Thomas D. Waite, Junko Kazumi, Linda Farmer, Thomas R. Capo, 
  Peter Lane, Gary Hitchcock, Sharon L. Smith & Steven G. Smith.  The two main aims of this project are to: 1) construct a facility to test treatment 
  options for ballast water at large scale, and 2) conduct experiments to measure 
  and verify efficacy of mechanical treatment (self-cleaning strainers and hydrocyclones) 
  followed by physical treatment  (UV light) on killing or removing marine 
  organisms and microorganisms.   The construction of the Ballast 
  Water Treatment Test Facility at the Rosensteil School of Marine and Atmospheric 
  Sciences (RSMAS), University of Miami, with an operational system for the self-cleaning 
  strainer coupled with the UV unit, was completed in February, 2001.  Testing 
  commenced February 2001 and will conclude by June 2001.   The treatment test facility is 
  located a short distance onshore from the pump.  Holding tanks of 200 gallons 
  (approximately 750 liters) were installed at three sample points within the 
  pilot plant.  Specifically, sampling points are located before and after 
  the mechanical treatment, and before and after the physical treatment (UV).  
  These tanks allowed for the collection of samples to evaluate the organisms 
  either retained or passing the representative unit operations.  In addition, 
  a 30 gal (approximately 115 liter) tank was installed at the head of the treatment 
  facility, along with a high pressure injection pump to augment turbidity.  
 A Hayward Strain-o-Matic® 
  Self-Cleaning Strainer was selected for testing as the first mechanical treatment 
  process in the pilot plant.  A carbon steel and stainless steel unit Model 
  No. 596 was installed, including a 50 µm stainless steel screen.  A Krebs 
  Model KSH-20 Desander hydrocyclone was selected for testing as the second mechanical 
  treatment process.  This hydrocyclone was selected for demonstration as 
  it has already been tested for the removal of zebra mussel larvae.   After the mechanical treatment 
  process, a secondary UV treatment process was tested.  A full-scale UV 
  system designed by Wedeco-Ideal Horizons, Inc., included a unit containing 60 
  low pressure lamps with an estimated dosage of 30,000 µm Ws/cm2 at 
  60% service capacity.  It was anticipated that this design allowed for 
  the most efficient UV treatment of ballast water possible.  Preliminary 
  data indicates that UV is unlikely to be suitable as an effective ballast water 
  treatment option.  Dr. Thomas D. Waite, College of Engineering, University of Miami, 1251 Memorial 
  Drive, Coral Gables, Florida 33146, United States of America  Tel: +1 305 284 2908, Fax: +1 305 284 2885, Email: twaite@miami.edu 
 
 Shipboard Trials of Ballast Water Treatment Systems by Maritime 
  Solutions   Richard Fredricks, Jeffrey Miner & Christopher Constantine 
   Maritime Solutions Inc., a private 
  US company, has received major from the State of Maryland Port Administration 
  and the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) to support 
  the rigorous testing of the its patent pending ballast water treatment system.  
  The programme seeks to demonstrate whether the system is a safe, effective, 
  economical, energy efficient and crew friendly shipboard treatment system as 
  an effective alternative to the troubled practice of ballast exchange.  Maritime Solutions, working in 
  cooperation with the University of Maryland, has additionally won the support 
  of the U.S. Maritime Administration to allow the testing programme to take place 
  aboard the 39,000 dead weight tonne Cape May, a ship of the U.S. Ready Reserve fleet.  Berthed in 
  the Port of Baltimore, it will provide for realistic shipboard testing taking 
  water from Chesapeake Bay.  The Maritime Solutions' ballast water treatment system consists of two stages; 
  a first stage patented ‘voraxial’ separator and a second stage treatment of 
  ultraviolet (UV) irradiation or, alternatively, the chemical biocide Seakleen 
  or PeracleanOcean.   This paper presents results from 
  work to date.  Maritime Solutions Inc., 17 Battery Place, Suite 913, New York, NY 10004, United 
  States of America  Tel: +1 212 747 9044, Fax: +1 212 747 9240, Email: info@maritimesolutionsinc, 
  Web: www.maritimesolutions.com 
 
 Effects of Cyclonic Separation and UV Treatment  
 Terri Sutherland1, Colin Levings, Shane Petersen 
  & Wayne Hesse  The Integrated Cyclone-UV Treatment 
  System (ITS) was designed by Velox Technology Inc. as a prototype test apparatus 
  to simulate treatment of ballast water. The ITS contains two separate treatment 
  phases: 1) cyclonic pre-treatment and 2) ultraviolet radiation (UV) treatment. 
  The cyclonic separation phase consists of a single housing, which contains 3 
  parallel cyclone tube apparatii (patent-pending). Each cyclone tube immediately 
  generates high centrifugal forces and imparts a gravitational force on suspended 
  particulates as water passes through each tube. The centrifugal force is derived 
  from the conversion of potential energy of the process stream to kinetic energy 
  at the separator’s feed inlet. The gravitational force (G) imparted on suspended 
  particulates varies depending upon the mass and kinetic strength of each particle. 
  Since variations in the size, mass, and exoskeleton structure existed for the 
  targeted species, differences in the kinetic strength of each species would 
  differ along with mortality estimates. The pre-treatment cyclonic apparatus 
  utilized for this study was designed to operate at a pressure drop of 7 to 10 
  PSIG.    Because higher-density and usually 
  larger-sized particles have significantly higher centrifugal forces imparted 
  upon them, “heavier particles” tend to migrate to the outer wall while travelling 
  down the length of each tube before exiting out the post-solids outlet (PS). 
  Thus, two distinct size fractions are discharged through separate outlets located 
  at the distal ends of the cyclonic housing. After cyclonic pre-treatment, the 
  post-cyclone (PC) pre-treated water flows to the secondary treatment stage through 
  to the ultraviolet (UV) chamber which may contain up to 8 UV-C lamps. The UV 
  test chamber provided allowed for the experiments to be conducted utilizing 
  two different UV-C lamp sizes and (nominal) wattages.  For this study, 
  combinations of 39W and 120W lamps were used to generate the UV dosages necessary 
  for the experiments.  Treatment experiments were carried 
  out between October, 1999, and January, 2000, at the West Vancouver Laboratory, 
  West Vancouver, British Columbia (Fisheries and Oceans Canada).  The paper 
  presents results from this work.  1 Fisheries and Oceans Canada , West Vancouver 
  Laboratory, 4160 Marine Drive , West Vancouver , British Columbia V7V 1N6 , 
  Canada  Tel: +1 604 666 8537 , Fax: +1 604 666 3497 , Email: sutherlandt@pac.dfo-mpo.gc.ca 
  , Web: www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca  
 The OptiMarin System  Birgir Nilsen, Halvor Nilsen & Tom Mackey The paper reviews the OptiMar 
  Ballast System a possible practical solution to the treatment of ballast water.  
  It examines the treatment of ballast water using solids separation as a pre-treatment 
  and UV light as the primary on-board treatment of ballast water.  The various 
  components of the system are presented and described including improvements 
  based on the experience gathered from the project.  The installation of 
  an OptiMar Ballast System aboard the cruise ship Regal Princess is discussed.  
  The conclusions of the results of the various testing of the system both prior 
  to and after the full-scale shipboard installation are presented. We refer to 
  the respective reports for detailed findings and results.  OptiMarin AS, 190 Henry Street, Bldg 18, Stamford, CT 06902, United States 
  of America  Tel: +1 203 973 0678, Fax: +1 413 683 3240, Email bnilsen@optimarin.com, 
  Web: www.ballastwater.com or www.optimarin.com 
 
 Ballast Water Treatment R&D Activities on North American 
  Pacific Coast  Scott Smith  Numerous international, national, regional and local groups are discussing 
  ways to minimize the spread of invasive species from ballast water.  Everyone 
  is hampered by the same set of problems.  Creating a practical and effective 
  ballast water discharge standard is complicated by the vast diversity of organisms 
  found in ballast water.  Ballast water treatment is new and rapidly evolving 
  with many promising technologies, but none that have been widely proven in the 
  varied world of shipboard operations.  Ballast water treatment testing 
  facilities have not been available for long-term standardized testing of technology 
  effectiveness.  The production and installation of new treatment technologies 
  is hampered by the lack of a standard.  The US National Invasive Species 
  Act states that any form of treatment must be as good or better than ballast 
  exchange, which unintentionally complicates the establishment of a standard 
  because of the difficulty in defining the varying effectiveness of exchange.  
  Salinity testing is the current method of evaluating exchange and is regarded 
  as ineffective.  All of these interrelated problems need to be addressed 
  in a manner that promotes consensus for a unified state, national, and international 
  ballast water management program.  The Pacific Ballast Water 
  Treatment Pilot Project was established to cooperatively conduct ballast water 
  research of common interest to the International Maritime Organization, U.S. 
  Coast Guard, British Columbia, and the US Pacific states of California, Oregon, 
  Washington and Alaska.  Researching new methods to stop invasive species 
  introductions from ballast water unites the project partners in a common goal.  
  The ambitious efforts undertaken in this project are beyond the ability of any 
  single member.  By combining resources, we increase our ability to solve 
  problems that impede the development of a comprehensive and effective ballast 
  water management program.   A research team has been 
  formed to cooperatively conduct the research undertaken in this project with 
  guidance from advisory teams.  Each team member focuses on a specific project, 
  yet each adds their expertise to the development of all project components.   
  The team members are from diverse backgrounds providing a balance of scientific, 
  professional and political perspectives.  The diversity of team members 
  is intended to insure that our results will be scientifically defensible, practical 
  and widely accepted.   The Project objectives include 
  the building of a ballast water research facility for pilot scale testing, shipboard 
  installations for full-scale testing, establishment of standardized testing 
  protocols, a recommended interim standard for ballast discharges, and a recommended 
  monitoring protocol to verify the effectiveness of ballast water exchange.   
  Individual project results will be submitted to various journals for publication 
  and combined together into one comprehensive project report.  Scott Smith, Washington 
  Department of Fish and Wildlife, United States of America  Email: smithss@dfw.wa.gov 
 
 Ballast Water Treatment R&D Activities in Japan  Takeaki Kikuchi, Katsumi Yoshida & Beatriz Casareto  Research and development efforts 
  have been made in various countries in the world to develop techniques to replace 
  the exchange of ballast water.  Japan is developing at present a new technique 
  using a special pipe.  This pipe, being simple in its structure, physically 
  destroy particles existing in sea water.  The device is planned to be integrated 
  into the ballast pipe system, for sterilization of sea water through its passage 
  during ballasting and/or deballasting operations.  This method can be adopted 
  without changing usual ballasting operations, being not necessary extra energy 
  supply or special maintenance.  Japan considers the method excellent since 
  it is environmentally harmless, easy in maintenance and economical in operation.  
  In this paper. we report the pipe method on the basis of results got on land 
  experiment, and a comparison with other methods as ozone treatment and dark 
  storage effects.  This research was carried out from 1999 to 2000.  The Japan Association of Marine Safety, 17-1 Toranomon 1-Chrome, Minato-Ku, 
  Tokyo 105-0001, Japan  Tel: +81 3 3502 3543, Fax: +81 3 3581 6136, Email: kikuti@oak.ocn.ne.jp 
 
  Simulations of Ballast Water Treatment  
 Professor Arne E Holdř   Ballast water treatment is a major issue for the design of new ships and the 
  redesign of present ships so that they can 
  comply with current ballast water management guidelines and regulations and 
  the forthcoming international  convention on ballast water management.  The research at the University of Hertfordshire related to this area has been 
  concerned with the simulation of three 
  aspects of Ballast Water treatment:  Modelling of ballast water exchange in open ocean away from territorial waters 
  or flow-through ballast water exchange.  Results from this work suggest that a combination of some of these methods 
  can give a very high species removal, whilst the first two methods can be very 
  effective on heir own. The chosen method(s) would depend on ship design and 
  requirements for water exchange or species/ micro-organism removal. The studies 
  carried out at Hatfield have utilized Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) methods 
  based on the software suite Phoenics from CHAM Ltd in Wimbledon. It is argued 
  that using such methods at an early stage of the ship design or modification 
  can save building costs many times the costs of such analysis.  Professor Arne E Holdo, Fluid Mechanics 
  Research Group, Department of Aerospace, Automotive and Environmental Engineering 
  , University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL10 9A, United Kingdom 
 Tel: +44-1707-284272, Fax: +44-1707-285086, Email: a.e.holdo@herts.ac.uk 
 
 Ballast System Design for Flow-through Exchange  Graeme Armstrong  Ballast water exchange is currently 
  recommended as the main ballast water management measure in IMO guidelines, 
  the US National Invasive Species Act and other legislation, regulations and 
  guidelines, even though its effectiveness is not finally resolved. At present 
  it is the best available approach.  Exchange by means of emptying and refilling 
  tanks would be preferred but this may not always be achievable due to considerations 
  of stability, longitudinal stress limits, and the possibility of damage due 
  to sloshing in partially filled tanks.  This leads to consideration of 
  the alternative of flushing the tanks with at least three times the tank volume 
  (flow-through exchange), as an alternative to complete emptying and refilling.  
  Most existing ships are not fitted with ballast water systems that are well 
  suited to facilitate effective and efficient flow-through exchange.  Ballast 
  system design modifications may be required.  This paper presents a detailed 
  design of a ballast system to permit continuous flow-through exchange of ballast 
  water, as investigated for the 190,000 dwt P&O bulk carrier Ormond, 
  which trades between Europe, Brazil, Japan and Australia.   Graeme Armstrong, Three Quays Marine Services, 12-20 Camomile Street, London 
  EC3A 7AS, United Kingdom  Tel: +44 20 7929 2299, Fax: +44 20 7929 1650, Email: Enquiries@threequays.com 
 Ship Design Considerations to Facilitate Ballast Water Management Alan Taylor1 & Geoff Rigby2  This review covers the use of 
  all current published ballast water management and treatment options and looks 
  at ship design enhancement to facilitate the minimisation of the risk of the 
  introduction of harmful aquatic organisms and pathogens in ship’s ballast water 
  and sediment discharges.  The review covers work carried 
  out by the current authors over many years that includes operational, repair, 
  design and research work as well as recent work reported by other  workers. 
 The main objective of this review 
  has been to suggest design, operational and maintenance procedures that can 
  be considered by shipbuilders, owners and operators that will facilitate improved 
  management and treatment of ballast water on new and existing ships.   The method employed was to look 
  at the existing design of ships using best practice design aspects and operational 
  experience related to sea chests, ballast tanks (especially strength, stability, 
  water flow and minimisation of sediment accumulation), ballast pumps and pipework 
  and chain lockers in relation to sediments.  This in conjunction with a 
  review of the currently recommended precautionary practices, management measures 
  and treatment options relating to ballast water were used to develop suggested 
  designs, operational and maintenance procedures.  1Alan H Taylor and Associates, 59 Hillcrest Drive, Templestowe, 
  Victoria 3106, Australia  Tel: +61 3 9846 2650, Fax:  +61 3 9846 2650, Email: aht@ahtaylor.com, 
  Web: www.ahtaylor.com  2 Reninna Pty Limited, 36 Creswell Avenue, Charlestown, NSW 2290, 
  Australia.  Tel: +61 2 4943 0450, Fax: +61 2 4947 8938, Email:  rigby@mail.com |