Help Contact us Log in Sitemap
Recommend Font smaller Font larger
Danube Watch 3 2006

Searching for heavy metals behind the Iron Gates

Samples of sediment from the river’s bottom are being tested for heavy metals, organic micro-pollutants and nutrients in a project funded by the UNDP-GEF Danube Regional Project.

Credit: Szaloky

Framed by Golubac Castle, the research vessel Argus collects samples of sediment from the river’s bottom to be tested for heavy metals. The vessel was donated by the German government to the Serbian government in 2002.

At one spot, Béla Csányi had to dive into the murky water to loosen the plastic tube from the mucky bottom with his hands. At others, the tube torpedoed downwards and struck hard rock, just where one would think the bottom muck would be metres in depth. “It was very difficult to figure out where the sediment actually was,” says Csányi.

Csányi was aboard the research vessel Argus, donated by the German government to the Serbian government in 2002. The vessel was on the Danube River immediately upstream from the ‘Iron Gates’ dam along the Romanian and Serbian border. Csányi and colleague Ferenc Lászlo from Hungary’s ‘Vituki’ Environmental Protection and Water Management Research Institute, and national teams from Romania and Serbia, were contracted by the UNDP-GEF Danube Regional Project (DRP) to take samples of sediment from the river’s bottom last September. Samples would then be tested for heavy metals, organic micro-pollutants and nutrients, with government partners from Romania’s National Research and Development Institute for Environmental Protection – ICIM Bucharest and Serbia’s Jaroslav Cerni Institute, Belgrade.

The three-day study was needed to assess the sediment ‘trapped’ by the dam in the massive artificial reservoir that was created behind it. Results will provide valuable information to the two countries as well as the ICPDR about the accumulation and distribution of, and changes in, pollution over time in the reservoir. This will then inform decisions about whether measures
need to be taken to clean the sediment as part of basin-wide efforts to meet the EU Water Framework Directive by 2015.

Credit: Szaloky Sediment samples from the river’s bottom are still being tested and final results are expected soon with the last related workshop to be held in February 2007.

Understanding the river. The reservoir itself is over 100 km long with effects that can be felt as far away as Belgrade. Its width ranges from a few km to about 200 m within a beautiful rock-steeped gorge. More than a century ago, the river’s fast waters in the gorge had propelled engineers to construct a steam-powered device that pulled ships through the chaos to safety.

Prehistoric tectonic shifts in the earth’s crust formed the gorge. “Little is known about its bottom structure other than it is actually lower than the surface of the Black Sea over 1000 km away,” says Csányi.

“The result is that nobody knows where exactly the sediment is deposited,” adds Lászlo. “Besides varied depths, flow conditions also vary. So there are some stagnant zones where sediment settles and other zones where flows are fast and retention is low. Flow conditions also change which means that bottom sediment can be re-suspended and transported away. A full future mapping of the area’s depths, structure and flows would help.”

Collecting data. One sure thing is that sediment is accumulating. This was proven in 2001 by the first ‘Joint Danube Survey (JDS)’, launched by the ICPDR, which showed that water transparency in some places downstream from the dam was two metres deep, while the average for the entire Danube is 50 cm and in Budapest it’s only 30 cm.

JDS 1 assessed water over the entire Danube River. The Iron Gates was included but not in great detail. At that time, pollutants were discovered in the sediment including pesticides. However, no extreme pollution peaks were mapped.

“Initial results from last September show no major changes nor any pollution peaks,” says Lászlo. Samples are still being tested and final results are expected in November with a final related workshop to be held in February 2007.

The DRP sub-project is also reviewing currently available information on sediment pollution in the reservoir and impacts that might follow the potential remobilisation of sediment pollutants. Recommendations for future monitoring and precautionary measures will also be provided.

Kirstie Shepherd is a freelance journalist and the Editor of Danube
Watch. She has called the Danube River Basin home since 2000.

 Next: From conflict to cooperation


The information contained in the ICPDR website is intended to enhance public access to information about the ICPDR and the Danube River. The information is correct to the best of the knowledge of the ICPDR Secretariat. If errors are brought to our attention we will try to correct them.
The ICPDR, expert group members, nor other parties involved in preparation of information contained on this website cannot, however, be held responsible for the correctness and validity of the data and information provided, nor accept responsibility or liability for damages or losses arising directly or indirectly from the use of the information conveyed therein.
Only those documents clearly marked ICPDR documents reflect the position of the ICPDR.
Any links to other websites are provided for your convenience only. The ICPDR does not accept any responsibility for the accuracy, availability, or appropriateness to the user's purposes, of any information or services on any other website.
When using the information and material provided on this website, credit should be given to the ICPDR.

Last Edit: 2007-01-08